Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 297A918200 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 04:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63555 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2015 04:50:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 63507 invoked by uid 500); 13 May 2015 04:50:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63495 invoked by uid 99); 13 May 2015 04:50:17 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 May 2015 04:50:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3B170C45CF for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 04:50:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.88 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id odPHoupPM8jP for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 04:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3131645419 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 04:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iget9 with SMTP id t9so108765554ige.1 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 21:50:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8umrSBxmty6lEC/pV2kmSoxkJc0z2+V3GAUlIeXcQ28=; b=HPIs3gIS6ppUwDeZi+2O0aX2cTzArAgx+UqVWPmSHJwqTot1MhKt1wIdFlSNuPj0eL G7KJJbkC5VWSTW7qfBgwP3Czd+yndGos58q23iM8WKsPdFYwrzj6NYl9u2GzHYuylgFq S4PNOv6ZirkBapJN8IbDpTWoqiltIy0q/Hi2WYUsUMhp3tTRgU9ExGdc9iEYWZg5M0/P 6EzGTu1M5mz62c8diMm5VyG9fr+ySaao19beZCgwOhMOa9Mok2GtdS7YtOjZu7TM/Y9j bs2GeJWgBVpT4Ye20Fz7S1bkjNhsvr8TEcdDoPEOEmZMq+/wLT4s6wVjTiLn3nNrbu9e YQSg== X-Received: by 10.42.204.14 with SMTP id fk14mr6807073icb.96.1431492610766; Tue, 12 May 2015 21:50:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.176.210 with HTTP; Tue, 12 May 2015 21:49:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <96BE372A-403C-4C06-983B-772EE08EB878@apache.org> <55349A79.7000307@gmail.com> <553A5CA4.7080903@gmail.com> <7ADBC56C-8502-493D-81AB-4769017B3F60@apache.org> <34A19E74-87C3-4F49-B51D-3E451CB630E2@apache.org> <578C0AFF-508C-4D95-8843-F916FFE18870@apache.org> <554696BF.1030501@gmail.com> <55471491.9000206@gmail.com> <05CF3A54-E30D-4A64-8314-DC0301491025@apache.org> <95688CD4-B77B-4B24-81F0-7CE4858E73C3@apache.org> <4C2B8622-012D-4CAF-A977-1ECD2E69D977@apache.org> <899B5821-273A-4CCA-A218-91F52A66C6C4@apache.org> From: Ted Dunning Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 05:49:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: users and dev lists To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30363b93903e380515ef58d6 --20cf30363b93903e380515ef58d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Actually, the Apache one is probably better since work addresses can disappear. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > Ah I see, sorry! The UCI one is probably best, then. > > - Ian > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > > > No for the moderation e-mails :) > > Which address do you use for the mailing lists? > > > > Thanks, > > Till > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > > > > Oh, on the commit logs? Unfortunately in Gerrit it takes the committe= r > > from > > > the account's email address, I believe... > > > > > > - Ian > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Till Westmann > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Do you want to use use the UCI or the Apache e-mail address? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ian Maxon wrote: > > > > > > > > > If I'm not already a moderator I'd be happy to volunteer... > > > > > > > > > > - Ian > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > We currently have 7 moderators, so I think that we can just tak= e > > you > > > > out > > > > > > (I guess that requires and infra-request, is that right?). > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand I would be more than happy if we found anothe= r > > > > > volunteer > > > > > > moderator! > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 11, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Jochen Wiedmann < > > > > > jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd welcome to have another volunteer to replace me as a > > moderator. > > > > > > > (As this would be my 9th or 10th list to moderate.) As Till > > wrote, > > > > > > > list moderation isn't much of a burden. OTOH, it accumulates.= .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jochen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Till Westmann < > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committe= rs > > on > > > > the > > > > > > mailing lists page [2]. > > > > > > >> The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!) > > > > dropdown. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > > > >> Till > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe < > > > > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe> > > > > > > >> [2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html < > > > > > > http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann < > tillw@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> I=E2=80=99ve also added this list to our incubation status = page [1]. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you > update > > it > > > > > > again? > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>> Till > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html < > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann < > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > tillw@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> users@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org > > > > > users@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org> is available now. > > > > > > >>>> Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list > > down. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>> Till > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>>> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann < > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > tillw@apache.org>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> I=E2=80=99ve requested a users mailing list using the req= uest form > at > > > > [1]. > > > > > > >>>>> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers > (Mike > > > and > > > > > I). > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>> Till > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator < > > > > > > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey < > dtabass@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > dtabass@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> Cool! > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that > moderators > > > see > > > > > > candidate > > > > > > >>>>>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Repl= y > > with > > > > no > > > > > > >>>>>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all > > accepts > > > > the > > > > > > message > > > > > > >>>>>>> and whitelists the sender. > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the > message > > is > > > > > > deleted. > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the th= e > > > > > reply-all > > > > > > trick. > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey < > > > dtabass@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying > "this > > > note > > > > > > may indeed > > > > > > >>>>>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying = to > > > > watch?) > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Mike > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that > > way, > > > > I=E2=80=99m > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Are there other volunteers? > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning < > > > > > ted.dunning@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderator= s > > > rather > > > > > > than fewer. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of > moderation > > > > > traffic > > > > > > to be > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the > moderators > > is > > > > > > very, very > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> low. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing > it > > it > > > > > > higher, I > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> think, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann < > > > > > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this= . > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few > > > moderators > > > > > > for the > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> list. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for th= e > > > other > > > > > > lists. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC > > members > > > > > > moderate as > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> well? > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann < > > > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here=E2=80=99s the JIRA: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 < > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann < > > > > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I=E2=80=99ll ask for t= he users > > list. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann < > > > > > > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that ha= s > no > > > > > impact > > > > > > outside > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC > members > > > > > > (mentors + > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> initial > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested > issue, > > we > > > > > > could take > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your > > proposal > > > > is > > > > > > accepted, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> if > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.htm= l > < > > > > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey < > > > > dtabass@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now > that > > > we > > > > > > close in on a > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one.= I > > > > realize > > > > > > there are > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users alread= y > > who > > > > are > > > > > > decidedly > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to > > have > > > a > > > > > > list "for > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> them" > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and > > > > volume). > > > > > > Is there a > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by > > those > > > > that > > > > > > get to > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a > > > > > > post-joining-incubation > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> decision. :-)) > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westman= n > < > > > > > > tillw@apache.org > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I=E2=80=99m not completely sure that I want one. W= e > currently > > > have > > > > > > one and > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the > discussions > > > are > > > > > at > > > > > > a > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> user-level. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-lis= t, > > so > > > > > > developers > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily > the > > > > other > > > > > > way > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> around. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single > > list > > > > > would > > > > > > work > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better. > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated > notifications, > > > like > > > > > > Jira issues, > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user > list? > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare= , > > > > > > > and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One > Two > > > > Three) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --20cf30363b93903e380515ef58d6--