Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DDE317CF1 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 12:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57522 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 12:33:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-asterixdb-dev-archive@asterixdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 57471 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2015 12:33:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 57459 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2015 12:33:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 12:33:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com does not designate 54.191.145.13 as permitted sender) Received: from [54.191.145.13] (HELO mx1-us-west.apache.org) (54.191.145.13) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2015 12:33:31 +0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 729CC24B3F for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 12:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so180839237wgi.0 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 05:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=BfRYch6AhGXe1m6s4KSjI8kZlIbOT/f6Wyevg3ipypM=; b=TiCYyIaC/oHAdnbYF+1EteVpjYh2ytNW+xBjYOs2/X+GwpoaGvOh2nNaMfgrC/aAmd 4r5trOTsHzH9d9Rp319a7pWkhyYFCnbPHGsv3H/T4fpkbGcRrV5LrPIOLivbflmodkUN MD5EMuxdvYistA3BwSI/SwvNLcj4m+g2zSCSzUoUjcQ47icDfpK2X3ddqqsWDCOoB8Jo TQ9QF56Z1x/kIr2jt9aOSskf2ykD7WgjpXD4HeMLynE5NCHO8sqdwlB9C9t8zACZ4Fan sJ+RJsInbkP9nE51D3mbTBy/N70BqevUqcOWMEDNjwBG83xIKyUI7Zvi/3pkVWMTuhsZ qBuA== X-Received: by 10.180.106.131 with SMTP id gu3mr3713660wib.16.1430829099740; Tue, 05 May 2015 05:31:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.0.88 with HTTP; Tue, 5 May 2015 05:31:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jochen Wiedmann Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:31:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Regarding git workflows and who must push a patch To: dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Till Westmann wrote: > Do our mentors have so experience with this? Sorry: New area for me too. I have created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9599