asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: users and dev lists
Date Sun, 03 May 2015 17:29:53 GMT
My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than fewer.
Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to be
driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, very low.
The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, I think,
than the load on a number of moderators.



On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:

> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this.
> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for the list.
> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists.
> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members moderate as well?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
> > On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Here’s the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> >> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Till
> >>
> >>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact outside
> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + initial
> committer) are those who get to decide.
> >>>
> >>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could take
> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is accepted, if
> nobody objects within 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Till
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <dtabass@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close in on a
> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize there are
> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are decidedly
> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list "for them"
> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume).  Is there a
> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get to
> decide?  (This will be our first case-study in a post-joining-incubation
> decision. :-))
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have
one and
> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a user-level.
> >>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so developers
> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way around.
> >>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would
work
> better.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers?
> >>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira issues,
> >>>>> commit messages, etc.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jochen
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message