asterixdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Incubator Report
Date Sun, 05 Apr 2015 17:56:32 GMT
Thanks Till, just signed off.

No worries about shepherd, we will get one for next round =)

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org> wrote:
> Posted a draft. However - since we are late to the game - we don’t have a shepherd.
> Should we be concerned about that?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
>
>> On Apr 4, 2015, at 9:54 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi Till, yep we should!
>>
>> Can you or someone else grab the template I used for last month and
>> please post a draft on the latest April 2015 report? Then let me know
>> by replying back here and I will review (as can others including the
>> mentors for sign off).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Chief Architect
>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Till Westmann <tillw@apache.org>
>> Reply-To: "dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org"
>> <dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org>
>> Date: Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 9:50 PM
>> To: "dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org"
>> <dev@asterixdb.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Incubator Report
>>
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> should we report to the incubator for this month [1] as well?
>>> I think that we are on monthly reporting right and so I think we should
>>> (even though the report really hasn’t changed a lot).
>>> How do you see this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>>>
>>> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2015
>>> <http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2015>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message