arrow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Result vs Status
Date Fri, 04 Oct 2019 23:40:55 GMT
>
> >
> >  It was my impression that we had workable solutions for using Result in
> at
> > least Python and Glib/Ruby (I'm don't know about R).
>
> In Python we do (though it needed a C++-side helper).
>

OK, so what  could more context be provided on:


> From the discussion in the sync call, it seems reasonable to require that:
> Public APIs which are likely to be directly wrapped in a binding should not
> use Result<> to the exclusion of Status. An equivalent Status API should
> always be provided for ease of binding.


Thanks,
Micah

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:42 AM Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> wrote:

>
> Le 03/10/2019 à 06:13, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> >
> >  It was my impression that we had workable solutions for using Result in
> at
> > least Python and Glib/Ruby (I'm don't know about R).
>
> In Python we do (though it needed a C++-side helper).
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message