From dev-return-11297-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@arrow.apache.org Mon Mar 25 21:11:12 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D7A518064C for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:11:11 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 43603 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2019 21:11:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@arrow.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@arrow.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@arrow.apache.org Received: (qmail 43591 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2019 21:11:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:11:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E9CEEC0324 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:11:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.907 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.105, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PSBQd3lHsGJV for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-f52.google.com (mail-ot1-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A7BEB60F7C for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-f52.google.com with SMTP id d24so9422275otl.11 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:11:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y91L0EXR/S+xlElpuw3jxS+gBZNwdyflfjK9/0nZQOU=; b=LeHt+J/4DeIfluXq+JWGz8zjXUFxRhHstWVrxBp2gRnl4emEpa17FfTUxrkwlBVcEJ NkrgnTSjO22J0++Y5MRG45wqTI8Mzuhim8T1+Q3zPeyOpaZPQ/7SUbtMzQjIWfyMfO47 rysIFOBieDdqF3LL+eUweBBB4fP8n84kaqrYarJCX14af5H6L9zEhS1pOEpPwseaKrfI sw49NpF4ZiEzrtPwn6W5zGNJGKnuGg1/oHb7vp8IL1rVVKRCVPDQPRVnUCdOOcgiBRxj BPQ88cNoTjfq4S0s04xvcaKeNVtpzvv/It92QH3lLbItCgRgtwKLiLYYw8iBEBQ96i0k 8Uxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=y91L0EXR/S+xlElpuw3jxS+gBZNwdyflfjK9/0nZQOU=; b=VrSJcsQ9vUgDDIO6Ny/m6XKa8Te8TGS9woftbGprtZpe2T3ZIkLehGAsdIVlsGD0f2 EBXTuEL8+0nr2viLde9/GwOI+O0eaI0RM4kk6cqMILFqudD5cDPSizxDoRxbKojnhKqm 02+d5WSwNIKl7fc6QxIsAxwrWfaNqtFivuCpOpC/3XhBS7mRnBW0caiR//BJvReBmAoB E+yI6u0/jaeIn5zOpNIuVPGSnyEfj8X4pu85SvtTkXqHoOUCA2aC36cdnf+BZD8HrH4h hmE9QqS/ZBp1HGcL3YRCWflwv9QiuRmGLKTediQCO/zGr76ZFp2Osn1yWxklKNqQ71Tp HPpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXmxzhaRkWx/OSvxIilDCl7w/unsm/kmD4wOjVC3Z5TUuHMEh4X iN5r1x3hoemILtrx87MHo+2HaS44bsPv43sdFfZ8fg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKpuSC1LCCXC2hv7KZj6rT9yHV4W0P4tUc1A10BpRUg8OvCeud7RUqYF8HNnru+aeW6udpYMT9xgc/UTatC1U= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4e13:: with SMTP id p19mr1768224otf.120.1553548262840; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190326.055313.859826700266370874.kou@clear-code.com> In-Reply-To: <20190326.055313.859826700266370874.kou@clear-code.com> From: =?UTF-8?B?S3Jpc3p0acOhbiBTesWxY3M=?= Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 22:10:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release To: dev@arrow.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000591fb80584f1a4bc" --000000000000591fb80584f1a4bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, I'll gladly help Kou. You've postponed the the packaging issues, but at least the wheel builds must pass, I'm still working on it. - K On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:03 PM Kouhei Sutou wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that nobody can be a release manager. > I'll be the release manager for 0.13.0. But I don't have > enough time. Could someone help me? > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:37:46 +010= 0, > Kriszti=C3=A1n Sz=C5=B1cs wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:21 PM Wes McKinney > wrote: > > > >> If Gandiva is causing packaging problems for 0.13 as a result of the > CMake > >> refactor, I suggest that we drop it from packages and plan to resolve > for > >> 0.14. So I think we should set a pretty strict time box for resolution > of > >> these issues (eg end of day Tuesday) > >> > > Sounds good to me. Do We have a release manager? > > > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019, 2:12 PM Kriszti=C3=A1n Sz=C5=B1cs < > szucs.krisztian@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hello all, > >> > > >> > I'm working on the conda and wheel builds: > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3832 > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4024 > >> > These must pass before We can cut the release. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Wes McKinney > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi folks, > >> > > > >> > > I think we should close the 0.13 backlog and try to get an RC0 out > >> ASAP. > >> > > What work must get done before that happens? > >> > > > >> > > I intend to sort out ARROW-4872 today. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks > >> > > Wes > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019, 5:00 PM Brian Hulette > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > I think that makes sense. I would really like to make JS part of > the > >> > > > mainstream releases, but we already have JS-0.4.1 ready to go [1= ] > >> with > >> > > > primarily bugfixes for JS-0.4.0. I think we should just cut that > and > >> > > > integrate JS in 0.14. > >> > > > > >> > > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12344961 > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:20 AM Wes McKinney > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > In light of the discussion on > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3630 I think we should > wait > >> > until > >> > > > > we have a "not broken" JavaScript-only release on NPM and have > >> > > > > confidence that we can respond to the community's needs > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:24 PM Paul Taylor < > ptaylor@apache.org> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I agree, the JS has matured a lot in the last few months. I > think > >> > > it's > >> > > > > > ready to join the regular Arrow releases. Let me know if I c= an > >> help > >> > > > > > integrate the publish scripts :-) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The two main things in progress are docs + Vector Builders, > >> neither > >> > > of > >> > > > > > which should block this release. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > We're going to try to get the docs/recipes ready for a PR th= is > >> > > weekend. > >> > > > > > If that lands shortly after 0.13.0 goes out, would it be > possible > >> > to > >> > > > > > update the website independently, or would that need to wait > >> until > >> > > > 0.14? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Paul > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On 3/19/19 10:08 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: > >> > > > > > > I'm in favor of including JS in the 0.13.0 release. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'm going to try to fix a couple of the Python Parquet bug= s > >> until > >> > > the > >> > > > > > > RC is ready to be cut, but none of them need block the > release. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Seems like we need someone else to volunteer to be the RM > for > >> > 0.13 > >> > > if > >> > > > > > > Uwe is unavailable next week. Antoine -- are you possibly = up > >> for > >> > it > >> > > > > > > (the initial setup will be a bit painful)? I don't have > access > >> > to a > >> > > > > > > machine with my code signing key on it until next week so = I > >> > cannot > >> > > do > >> > > > > > > it > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > - Wes > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:46 AM Kouhei Sutou < > >> kou@clear-code.com > >> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> There are no blockers on GLib, Ruby and Linux packages. > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Can we include JavaScript into 0.13.0? > >> > > > > > >> If we include JavaScript into 0.13.0, we can remove > >> > > > > > >> codes to release JavaScript separately. For example, we c= an > >> > > > > > >> remove dev/release/js-*. We can enable version update cod= e > >> > > > > > >> in dev/release/00-prepare.sh: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/00-prepare.sh#L67= -L74 > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> We can merge "JavaScript Releases" document into our > release > >> > > > > > >> document: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guid= e#ReleaseManagementGuide-JavaScriptReleases > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> Thanks, > >> > > > > > >> -- > >> > > > > > >> kou > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> In < > >> > > > > > CAJPUwMBGjzbwrwYBwse6BD9LnN_7XOZN_aQ2JOB9_MPVMHc07w@mail.gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > > > >> "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Mon, 18 Mar > 2019 > >> > > > 20:51:12 > >> > > > > -0500, > >> > > > > > >> Wes McKinney wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >>> hi folks, > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> I think we're basically at the 0.13 end game here. There= 's > >> some > >> > > > more > >> > > > > > >>> patches can get in, but do we all think we can cut an RC > by > >> the > >> > > end > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > > >>> the week? What are the blocking issues? > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> Thanks > >> > > > > > >>> Wes > >> > > > > > >>> > >> > > > > > >>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kouhei Sutou < > >> > kou@clear-code.com > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>> Hi, > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds: > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&query=3D= build-452 > >> > > > > > >>>> I've fixed .deb/.rpm packages: > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3934 > >> > > > > > >>>> It has been merged. > >> > > > > > >>>> So .deb/.rpm packages are ready for release. > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > >>>> -- > >> > > > > > >>>> kou > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>> In < > >> > > > > > CAHM19a5SOmZxGcphc6eE-Mr2USVVhWB252UdGjrVocQ-CB2dag@mail.gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > > > >>>> "Re: Timeline for 0.13 Arrow release" on Thu, 14 Mar > 2019 > >> > > > > 16:24:43 +0100, > >> > > > > > >>>> Kriszti=C3=A1n Sz=C5=B1cs wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> Submitted the packaging builds: > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/kszucs/crossbow/branches/all?utf8=3D%E2%9C%93&query=3D= build-452 > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 4:19 PM Wes McKinney < > >> > > > wesmckinn@gmail.com> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> The CMake refactor is merged! Kudos to Uwe for 3+ > weeks of > >> > > hard > >> > > > > labor on > >> > > > > > >>>>>> this. > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> We should run all the packaging tasks and get a full > >> > > accounting > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > >>>>>> what is broken so we aren't surprised during the > release > >> > > process > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:39 AM Kriszti=C3=A1n Sz=C5= =B1cs > >> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> The proof of the pudding is in the eating. You > convinced > >> > me. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 3:31 PM Wes McKinney < > >> > > > > wesmckinn@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Krisztian -- are you all right with proceeding with > >> > merging > >> > > > the > >> > > > > CMake > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> refactor? I'm pretty committed to helping fix the > >> problems > >> > > > that > >> > > > > come > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> up. Since most consumers of the project don't test > until > >> > > > > _after_ a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> release, we won't find out about some problems unti= l > we > >> > > merge > >> > > > > it and > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> release it. Thus, IMHO it doesn't make sense to wai= t > >> > another > >> > > > > 8-10 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> weeks since we'd be delaying feedback for that long= . > >> There > >> > > are > >> > > > > also a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> number of follow-on issues blocking on the refactor > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Andy Grove < > >> > > > > andygrove73@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I've cleaned up my issues for Rust, moving most of > them > >> > to > >> > > > > 0.14.0. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I have two PRs in progress that I would appreciate > >> > reviews > >> > > > on: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3671 - [Rust] > >> Table > >> > > API > >> > > > > (a.k.a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> DataFrame) > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/3851 - [Rust] > >> > Parquet > >> > > > > data > >> > > > > > >>>>>> source > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> in > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> DataFusion > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Once these are merged I have some small follow up > PRs > >> for > >> > > > > 0.13.0 > >> > > > > > >>>>>> that I > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> can > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> get done this week. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Andy. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:21 AM Wes McKinney < > >> > > > > wesmckinn@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> hi folks, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> I think we are on track to be able to release > toward > >> the > >> > > end > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > > >>>>>> this > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> month. My proposed timeline: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * This week (March 11-15): feature/improvement pu= sh > >> > mostly > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Next week (March 18-22): shift to bug fixes, > >> > > > stabilization, > >> > > > > empty > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> backlog of feature/improvement JIRAs > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Week of March 25: propose release candidate > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Does this seem reasonable? This puts us at about > 9-10 > >> > > weeks > >> > > > > from > >> > > > > > >>>>>> 0.12. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> We need an RM for 0.13, any PMCs want to voluntee= r? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Take a look at our release page: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3D103091= 219 > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Out of the open or in-progress issues, we have: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * C#: 3 issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * C++ (all components): 51 issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Java: 3 issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Python: 38 issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> * Rust (all components): 33 issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Please help curating the backlogs for each > component. > >> > > > There's > >> > > > > a > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> smattering of issues in other categories. There a= re > >> also > >> > > 10 > >> > > > > open > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> issues with No Component (and 20 resolved issues)= , > >> those > >> > > > need > >> > > > > their > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> metadata fixed. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Wes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:49 PM Wes McKinney < > >> > > > > wesmckinn@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> The timeline for the 0.13 release is drawing > closer. > >> I > >> > > > would > >> > > > > say > >> > > > > > >>>>>> we > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> should consider a release candidate either the > week > >> of > >> > > > March > >> > > > > 18 > >> > > > > > >>>>>> or > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> March 25, which gives us ~3 weeks to close out > >> backlog > >> > > > items. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> There are around 220 issues open or in-progress = in > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+0.13.0+Release > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please have a look. If issues are not assigned t= o > >> > someone > >> > > > as > >> > > > > the > >> > > > > > >>>>>> next > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> couple of weeks pass by I'll begin moving at lea= st > >> C++ > >> > > and > >> > > > > Python > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> issues to 0.14 that don't seem like they're goin= g > to > >> > get > >> > > > > done for > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 0.13. If development stakeholders for C#, Java, > Rust, > >> > > Ruby, > >> > > > > and > >> > > > > > >>>>>> other > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> components can review and curate the issues that > >> would > >> > be > >> > > > > > >>>>>> helpful. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> You can help keep the JIRA issues tidy by making > sure > >> > to > >> > > > add > >> > > > > Fix > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Version to issues and to make sure to add a > Component > >> > so > >> > > > that > >> > > > > > >>>>>> issues > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> are properly categorized in the release notes. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Wes > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 10:39 AM Wes McKinney < > >> > > > > > >>>>>> wesmckinn@gmail.com> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> See > >> > > > > > >>>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Release+Management+Guid= e > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The source release step is one of the places > where > >> > > > problems > >> > > > > > >>>>>> occur. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 10:33 AM < > aneesh@quiltdata.io > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Uwe L. Korn < > >> > > > mail@uwekorn.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could dockerize some of the release steps = to > >> > ensure > >> > > > > that > >> > > > > > >>>>>> they > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> run in the same environment. > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I may be able to help with said Dockerization. > If > >> not > >> > > for > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> release, then for the next. Are there docs on whi= ch > >> > > systems > >> > > > we > >> > > > > > >>>>>> wish to > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> target and/or any build steps beyond the current > dev > >> > > > > container ( > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/master/dev/container > >> > > )? > >> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --000000000000591fb80584f1a4bc--