arrow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Arrow 0.6.0 release planning and timeline
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2017 23:14:43 GMT
OK, I believe we are all set with the alignment patch in
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/954 if anyone wants to take a
last look.

I have one last Python issue that needs to be closed out, but barring
new developments, we should be able to start a 0.6.0 vote tomorrow
morning.

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com> wrote:
> In light of the mailing list discussion about buffer alignment in
> distributed stream construction (see ARROW-1343 and the mailing list
> discussion), I am going to hold off on cutting an RC until we can
> reach a resolution there. Otherwise things seem to be in good shape.
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> It looks like we should be able to close out 0.6.0 issues today and
>> cut a release candidate tomorrow if there are no objections. Please
>> take a moment to complete any code reviews for patches that should go
>> in. We have a number of Java library dependency upgrades pending, do
>> these need to go in?
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/929
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/873
>>
>> There is another Java patch that needs to be merged if someone could review:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/898
>>
>> There are a handful of C++ or Python patches pending, and I'll be
>> opening a few more PRs today; any code reviews would be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wes
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Siddharth Teotia <siddharth@dremio.com> wrote:
>>> Reviewed https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/915 for ARROW-1296
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Siddharth Teotia <siddharth@dremio.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will review it by EOD.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Li Jin <ice.xelloss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On the Java side I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1296,
>>>>> which is small bug fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone help review it would be great. Else if it doesn't get reviewed
>>>>> by 0.6 rc cut, we can take it off 0.6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Li
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > If there are no problems with the Plasma IP Clearance, I would like
to
>>>>> > cut a release candidate for 0.6.0 at the beginning of next week.
There
>>>>> > are a handful of issues pending on the Java and C++ side that I'll
be
>>>>> > working to complete over the next several days. Please keep an eye
on
>>>>> > the release page on JIRA:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There are a number of outstanding Java patches; if you would like
to
>>>>> > include any of these in the 0.6.0 release, could someone review?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Wes
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:59 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > It seems that ARROW-1282 is causing some users problems. We
have the
>>>>> > > option of making a 0.5.1 release, but given how much work has
reached
>>>>> > > master (or is about to reach master) I would be in favor of
>>>>> > > accelerating 0.6.0, cutting a release candidate within the
next couple
>>>>> > > of days. We could aim for another release within 2-3 weeks
after
>>>>> > > completing the Plasma IP clearance.
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > Thoughts?
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uwelk@xhochy.com>
wrote:
>>>>> > >> Hello,
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> from my side we're mostly fine for a 0.6.0 release. Currently
I'm
>>>>> facing
>>>>> > >> a problem with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1302
in
>>>>> the
>>>>> > >> 0.5.0 OSX wheels. We need to fix this before 0.6.0. Also
I would
>>>>> like to
>>>>> > >> look a bit more into the jemalloc issues that came up with
0.5.0 to
>>>>> get
>>>>> > >> some of them solved in the next release.
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> Uwe
>>>>> > >>
>>>>> > >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017, at 04:55 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>>>> > >>> hi all,
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> We're already 40 patches into the next Arrow version.
I just created
>>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1297 as
a tracking
>>>>> issue
>>>>> > >>> so that any blocking issues can be tracked as we push
forward to
>>>>> 0.6.0
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> You can track the status of the release here (accessible
from the
>>>>> > >>> "Projects" tab --> Releases in JIRA):
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341088
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> We don't have any more data types slated for integration
testing for
>>>>> > >>> this release, but it might be nice to try to finish
one or more of
>>>>> > >>> them in the next week or two:
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> - Fixed size binary
>>>>> > >>> - Fixed size lists
>>>>> > >>> - Decimal
>>>>> > >>> - Union
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> As far as timeline for 0.6.0, I would like to push
for an RC the
>>>>> week
>>>>> > >>> of 8/14 at latest (assuming we are ready to ship the
Plasma C++
>>>>> code),
>>>>> > >>> reducing scope if needed. Any contributions of code,
documentation,
>>>>> or
>>>>> > >>> JIRA prioritization would be much appreciated.
>>>>> > >>>
>>>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>>>> > >>> Wes
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

Mime
View raw message