arrow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com>
Subject Re: Arrow 0.3 release timeline
Date Fri, 14 Apr 2017 19:55:52 GMT
I'm looking through them

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi all,
>
> I'm working to close out the remaining Python and C++ stuff we wanted
> to get in to 0.3 for the sake of other Python projects that want to
> use Arrow.
>
> There are 8 patches up that touch the Java codebase. If we can get all
> these closed out then I think we should be able to cut a release
> candidate sometime next week.
>
> Thanks
> Wes
>
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > With the Easter holiday and long weekend, we probably will not be able
> > to do an RC until next week at earliest.
> >
> > In the meantime, there are a lot of patches in review. Please keep the
> > release JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670) updated
> > with blocking issues so we can track what patches are in progress or
> > still TODO.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Wes
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Le Dem <julien@dremio.com>
> wrote:
> >> The current 0.3 goal is good for me.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> hi folks,
> >>>
> >>> We've been making excellent progress toward the 0.3 release -- 123
> >>> patches in since 0.2, which was released a little over 6 weeks ago.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the JIRA to help track related issues:
> >>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670
> >>>
> >>> Once ARROW-510 (https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/475, thanks
> >>> Leif!) has been resolved, we'll have all of the date and time types
> >>> reconciled which was one of the major goals for the release. It would
> >>> be nice to get the fixed size binary working end to end (ARROW-634),
> >>> but if that slips to 0.4, I don't think it's a big deal.
> >>>
> >>> I know there are a number of other Java patches in flight; I will let
> >>> others comment on their status.
> >>>
> >>> What remains on the C++ and Python side
> >>>
> >>> * Decimal patch (ARROW-655)
> >>> * Some date and time compatibility with pandas
> >>> * Packaging issues on Linux / OS X, e.g. wheels for pyarrow that can
> >>> be compiled against / linked to by thirdparties
> >>> * Windows support for Python
> >>> * Some miscellanea parquet-cpp integration improvements
> >>>
> >>> If all goes well, we may be able to cut an RC next week or the week
> after.
> >>>
> >>> Is there anything else that others would like to see go into the 0.3
> >>> release? I think we may be able to make the 0.4 release more quickly
> >>> (~1 month or less after 0.3) as we finish out some of the additional
> >>> compatibility issues (dictionaries in IPC stream/file format is a
> >>> significant one).
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Wes
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Julien
>



-- 
Julien

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message