arrow-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julien Le Dem <jul...@dremio.com>
Subject Re: Arrow 0.3 release timeline
Date Fri, 14 Apr 2017 20:38:45 GMT
I reviewed the currently pending PRs on the java side.
I opened 2 PRs for the opened java JIRAs from the list: ARROW-777, ARROW-720

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Julien Le Dem <julien@dremio.com> wrote:

> I'm looking through them
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 9:26 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> I'm working to close out the remaining Python and C++ stuff we wanted
>> to get in to 0.3 for the sake of other Python projects that want to
>> use Arrow.
>>
>> There are 8 patches up that touch the Java codebase. If we can get all
>> these closed out then I think we should be able to cut a release
>> candidate sometime next week.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wes
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > With the Easter holiday and long weekend, we probably will not be able
>> > to do an RC until next week at earliest.
>> >
>> > In the meantime, there are a lot of patches in review. Please keep the
>> > release JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670) updated
>> > with blocking issues so we can track what patches are in progress or
>> > still TODO.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Wes
>> >
>> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Julien Le Dem <julien@dremio.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> The current 0.3 goal is good for me.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> hi folks,
>> >>>
>> >>> We've been making excellent progress toward the 0.3 release -- 123
>> >>> patches in since 0.2, which was released a little over 6 weeks ago.
>> >>>
>> >>> Here is the JIRA to help track related issues:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-670
>> >>>
>> >>> Once ARROW-510 (https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/475, thanks
>> >>> Leif!) has been resolved, we'll have all of the date and time types
>> >>> reconciled which was one of the major goals for the release. It would
>> >>> be nice to get the fixed size binary working end to end (ARROW-634),
>> >>> but if that slips to 0.4, I don't think it's a big deal.
>> >>>
>> >>> I know there are a number of other Java patches in flight; I will let
>> >>> others comment on their status.
>> >>>
>> >>> What remains on the C++ and Python side
>> >>>
>> >>> * Decimal patch (ARROW-655)
>> >>> * Some date and time compatibility with pandas
>> >>> * Packaging issues on Linux / OS X, e.g. wheels for pyarrow that can
>> >>> be compiled against / linked to by thirdparties
>> >>> * Windows support for Python
>> >>> * Some miscellanea parquet-cpp integration improvements
>> >>>
>> >>> If all goes well, we may be able to cut an RC next week or the week
>> after.
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there anything else that others would like to see go into the 0.3
>> >>> release? I think we may be able to make the 0.4 release more quickly
>> >>> (~1 month or less after 0.3) as we finish out some of the additional
>> >>> compatibility issues (dictionaries in IPC stream/file format is a
>> >>> significant one).
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Wes
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Julien
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Julien
>



-- 
Julien

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message