Mailing-List: contact dev-help@arrow.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@arrow.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKa9qDnOp-JAW0ad-Pc4K77-uC6XfPEJ=yfvAs6-+GsXFsHn3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADHNq9_104dbiBnnVYZpXYnNOHY=3x=q17pVp-DbSLvraMuToA@mail.gmail.com>
 <25076D87-BC28-4BA3-AAC4-AA98C0BAF31B@apache.org>
 <1042F431-16B5-48EE-BD6C-09C999E4DEDA@gmail.com>
 <CAKa9qDnOp-JAW0ad-Pc4K77-uC6XfPEJ=yfvAs6-+GsXFsHn3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jason Altekruse <altekrusejason@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:17:34 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAMpYv7C3xppyCs5UPHTnmi+MoDek4B5rMDCONrUAXzw5_+43uQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Code reviews / commit-then-review?
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11405fc016bcdc052d2b8889

--001a11405fc016bcdc052d2b8889
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

+1

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Jacques Nadeau <jacques@apache.org> wrote:

> +1. Sounds good to me.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:35 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I think CTR makes sense at this stage. RTC would slow things down
> > considerably.
> >
> > -Taylor
> >
> > > On Mar 3, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Julian Hyde <jhyde@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for asking.
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Mar 3, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Wes McKinney <wes@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> hi folks,
> > >>
> > >> I'm going to have many C++ and Python patches the next few weeks, any
> > >> objections to proceeding in commit-then-review mode (particularly on
> the
> > >> Python side) for the time being in the interest of expediency? I will
> be
> > >> more than happy to collect feedback from merged patches into new JIRAs
> > as
> > >> questions / ideas arise. Let me know.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> Wes
> > >
> >
> >
>

--001a11405fc016bcdc052d2b8889--