Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-arrow-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-arrow-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CDFF19E1F for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89524 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 19:00:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-arrow-dev-archive@arrow.apache.org Received: (qmail 89464 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 19:00:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@arrow.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@arrow.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@arrow.apache.org Received: (qmail 89452 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2016 19:00:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:00:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BC6CCC8C46 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:00:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2m9K9TvW3v7 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E32025F247 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 19:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id h65so31618991ywe.0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Um5qtGbH4sT4lLOziqzDJTp2SJgCjIgdj5AfGFUHdig=; b=L0yPHf3vAPSvSYCPqtv92kMF+/caaHJ3FkO+fC0pi8A+s9Q5eKmVT1MQDRws3TVcWB WjkLI/ex9AClikVTrEpgmoac2Hht7kcHlVfhbUCFtjYt4CUsw6+Gu0i8d8D/G/0o6w5M ua+1FXKSnhhaza0eeMIjG3FEXLDngkhqQHb3dDL8R0StQsXnK+NpJRvYVTeWmFdvdT9a DCUmK3zXBYCTtFQrJ72TSp6cfn2cWocPoLNik2f+VnnxwktoPw+WC/G9ccqf4HDahKLC QFmEPz+6M2KzXWvAo2RXVUeJE5qbPBXHBIeV4wn9vo29EST2Z+ZiGiCwoec+M4ESrSXn K/1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Um5qtGbH4sT4lLOziqzDJTp2SJgCjIgdj5AfGFUHdig=; b=iV3sMTTFss/2p/IY3w6lUpN4hJWMg7cFtOXtXtlhQj4RQUB5eBD9M4fTrkw9M8HZuR l9067jHhUesQLFcrMrNQDy4ps2WNKRMhGPF6mRmH2gqgEPM17C9lsLLrwnrkKDTUirbg nAE4VKJa6zzibIGB7mXOwJMUTFIbXFl7Wo7dXoDRIdAsJcH2XvlA+kNScl09eoMnOzvl o3VAd+nilX7b/HnHQOELMvSRFUaHzvu2TCFWE/nkwDXqV9yxclASsR22w+llS69eTNHl ZOSLr0JaQDEFMmxtdsAFdGT7iTclOs8GCqQBRkFJyfZuJfCfjz0gHdw0okGyR/KnWts2 JLbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI1WJmlg5CA6wB0nfQMtXthJG6dXimnCdAyzFJXsr9zLqZc20t22FmF3tGkwIwXfjTPKRM7A4j3mHxd+tQ+ X-Received: by 10.129.84.137 with SMTP id i131mr2142986ywb.5.1458759645274; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.44.82 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes McKinney Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:00:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Format change review request: ARROW-62 To: dev@arrow.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Can another committer please review https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/34 This corrects a format specification inconsistency viz-a-viz the bitmap encoding null/not-null from the initial draft format documents. Note that this is orthogonal to the discussion about whether the concept of "non-nullable" (or "required") is a part of the physical memory layout or the schema metadata. I will propose a patch for ARROW-76 after this one is addressed. Thank you, Wes