Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5423200BF1 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:34:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D3F22160B43; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 27F5B160B33 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:34:14 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1008 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2017 11:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aries.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aries.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aries.apache.org Received: (qmail 996 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2017 11:34:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:34:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 782461A05D3 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:34:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.731 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.731 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGd-rhkqzvF9 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E05B85F33E for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a197so382575616wmd.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:34:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=A65eodIRciH4llaUypTDH564wD0hVarPZPaPG73f5I8=; b=e1KOd/z3iYqLsiLx+L9GIm4q11COxsUdVXh9MmKSTWftZW9IqKW5zLd7HPLCLbtC/o ygHSTqquOe3oPsJnrqQvuicyHhUSIUs4F//8aTjc/U4aTcBpSvy8BCZOEgfa0XxrPbfj qTwKy499mot/sn38X/dmFFrM1vV8vPvTIkwCaGVJRHPQELwlPfZINaMftpn28JItNJsz nMh7xw61UOkhg1gYhnc5hWlbn4gi45v+y0m58CTrTBe/BBstFanJZdaUs92GD77/E8V1 iBcMIHAs2qDjjEtZ2c/00BxZNLImA00d7rJo+H95g20yy83MBu8ks2jm5l/wC0nf3oGa W+XQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A65eodIRciH4llaUypTDH564wD0hVarPZPaPG73f5I8=; b=IrcUmrw5Z43lqncoL/z/QeCCAbVZMl1tY2ZUo34bNFApkbViZSMUizbLONBMrwZxsF HkR9V7bgi8TXOxC2PfJVIxjFxHvGsESBcIGzfJxiTJUZ/hZYJHc65+eBWcZxXmWyp1R9 d7o41jS0w4nO0Zjh+SoaQrFrBAA1D6f6bHaBTqwxn/QQrQ7RQA9Vv2602M5FvAHtxbbZ bMBbCLornvkJqM3dbOhsiGIh+BCc5kxvTPOyxMCfzOBDUK1YGuJlm/iA8n8/jb+RHHNS ebLnSX5OyhndVtzNA7oo3OClRzWHJ27NMTxKa3Xpkix+J8j6zOEYH2j3Xghl+Viek0eZ bctw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJPGupjFuXnCrz/ZUMSBR7PEuHDPW00qO/T4uybjtDTYHBKfloWIuxGy0K2i7496Q== X-Received: by 10.28.161.67 with SMTP id k64mr57349686wme.69.1483443241098; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:34:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.118] (HSI-KBW-149-172-37-189.hsi13.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [149.172.37.189]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x140sm89156772wme.19.2017.01.03.03.34.00 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:34:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: Christian Schneider To: dev@aries.apache.org From: Christian Schneider Subject: [Proposal] Use release per subproject for blueprint Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:34:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:34:15 -0000 Currently the blueprint bundles are released individually. I think this creates a lot of overhead as there are quite many bundles and for each release you have to manually update the dependencies in several places. I am also sure that we quite regularly forgot to update dependencies. For example the blueprint-repository project was not updated for any recent releases. So I propose we change the blueprint subproject to always release all bundles and keep the bundle versions aligned. We should still be able to make the project very stable by using package versions for the APIs. A side effect would be that we could have blueprint karaf features and an OBR repository for other non karaf deployments in the aries blueprint code and the maintenance would be quite low. So what do you think? Christian -- Christian Schneider http://www.liquid-reality.de Open Source Architect http://www.talend.com