Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aries.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@aries.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Releases....
From: Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6C8089E-1B7A-424E-9A8C-9EECA426D397@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:37:28 -0500
Cc: David Bosschaert <david.bosschaert@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2EDD2831-C817-478D-8F52-274D63290275@apache.org>
References: <7B375F0C-3F3D-4590-99D1-07A6E68DCCA0@apache.org>
 <D49FD053-F1FC-41A2-9900-75B2D83BA571@apache.org>
 <CAMit8SoKu9232sBP1WR9gzsj1PA6t9LB3xoFQTcbcFfwsuHrng@mail.gmail.com>
 <F6C8089E-1B7A-424E-9A8C-9EECA426D397@apache.org>
To: dev@aries.apache.org


On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:

> Ah=85  there are some incompatible changes in =
org.apache.aries.jmx.codec that the version checker is flagging causing =
it to force it up to 2.0.    I'll see if I can make that package =
compatible enough to keep it 1.1.0.

OK.   I added back in some constructors which is allowing it to drop to =
1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. =20

David:  can you double check to make sure that change is OK?     Also, =
should I mark those constructors @Deprecated or not?


Dan


>=20
> Dan
>=20
>=20
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 11:16 AM, David Bosschaert =
<david.bosschaert@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> I would have thought that it should be version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT. That's =
what
>> I used when I committed the file from jmx-next.
>>=20
>> However I see that the version has been bumped to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT by =
Emily
>> in revision 1424200:
>> Revision: 1424200
>> Author: ejiang
>> Date: 19 December 2012 22:57:24
>> Message:
>> ARIES-979: Integrate semantic versioning maven plugin in aries =
modules
>> (jmx)
>>=20
>> Maybe Emily has an idea why it got bumped, but if you ask me it =
should be
>> 1.1...
>>=20
>> Cheers,
>>=20
>> David
>>=20
>> On 23 January 2013 15:56, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>=20
>>>=20
>>> David,
>>>=20
>>> I just noticed that jmx-api is now at version 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT, yet it =
says
>>> it implements the 1.1 API?   Is the version number there correct?   =
Kind of
>>> concerned about that version number as it would be outside the =
normal
>>> import range for existing bundles (likely [1.0,2) ).
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Dan
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> I've updated the aries builds to grab the released plugin.  Things =
look
>>> OK so I'm likely going to do a bunch of release builds tomorrow.   =
Talking
>>> to Guillaume and digging through the various commit logs and such, =
it looks
>>> like I'll need:
>>>>=20
>>>> util-r2
>>>> util
>>>> proxy-impl
>>>> proxy-bundle
>>>> blueprint-core
>>>> blueprint-cm
>>>> blueprint-bundle
>>>> jmx-api
>>>> jmx-core
>>>> jmx-blueprint-core
>>>> jmx-bundle
>>>> jmx-blueprint-bundle
>>>> transaction-blueprint
>>>> jpa-blueprint-aries
>>>> blueprint-itests
>>>> blueprint-testbundleb
>>>>=20
>>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to blast through them all
>>> tomorrow.   If you have any additional updates or changes, please =
speak up
>>> now.  Thanks!
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
>>> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>>>=20
>>>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>=20

--=20
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com