Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aries.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@aries.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9401D36D-ABC1-4780-8E9B-3BF06568EFD9@googlemail.com>
References: <9401D36D-ABC1-4780-8E9B-3BF06568EFD9@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:15:47 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAEQV+EE=xig0rsL71DpCWwQ5NKE6Mzz3VhU69uvNdCLUP3SSjA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ARIES-899
From: Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@gmail.com>
To: "dev@aries.apache.org" <dev@aries.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343ccc5b5efc04c8617dec

--047d7b343ccc5b5efc04c8617dec
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Do you have a pointer to the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies ?

On Wednesday, August 29, 2012, Holly Cummins wrote:

> Guillaume,
>
> It looks like the latest changes for ARIES-899 have caused several test
> failures. They don't show up in trunk, where we test with released
> versions, but if you look at the AriesWithSnapshotDependencies build you
> can see several tests which exercise the interaction of other modules with
> the latest Blueprint code have started failing since the 899 commit. Do you
> think you could investigate?
>
> (You may need to change poms to reproduce locally, but please don't commit
> those pom changes, like I did by accident when I investigated a snapshots
> test failure. I know it's a pain, so I'm still working on our maven goal to
> transparently test with snapshots.)
>
> Holly
>


-- 
------------------------
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
FuseSource, Integration everywhere
http://fusesource.com

--047d7b343ccc5b5efc04c8617dec--