Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-aries-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43738 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2011 16:19:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2011 16:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 17633 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 16:19:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aries-dev-archive@aries.apache.org Received: (qmail 17498 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2011 16:19:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@aries.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aries.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@aries.apache.org Received: (qmail 17480 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jan 2011 16:19:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:19:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zoe.slattery@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.48] (HELO mail-ww0-f48.google.com) (74.125.82.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:19:18 +0000 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so2060914wwd.17 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:18:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IFt5sh/VS/oO0M/Dcs1Gmf6YTuhLEyTgHjz0tW5gcgA=; b=fFBct61dRUkgSX12K+lz+9aPQuimsPvzOYPUruAPh2Jc05gp6QCdRg84JRzoJzPrDv 55T7ZyCi9Tw0rgTdGDFjF7ndSeHfyjImIwOPqb9qmsc0lxpV6tzHTLIitFdSEiGUpXDa E1yhFWe7ge+EPRJqgJ32eXCv3FWL5wlYNoB5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EUmF/VUn0EtK/dg8u3Hto84Wel4o+Gbgyfw+XoR46dEJy9S5TxhCKDf14prxqKHaNS vP6n93BuR/LlEaHiMIQGn2Em6XfnwWwkj/HFaXcMfGLrSTXSWULwhIw/TTGUsnWijSfL vUgxpO1fU3177iG6s404Z4Ems6WnALKazQGj0= Received: by 10.227.196.78 with SMTP id ef14mr977566wbb.165.1295626736730; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:18:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from zoe-slatterys-MacBook-Pro.local ([87.115.82.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm6995746wbi.12.2011.01.21.08.18.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:18:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D39B1EE.2030006@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:18:54 +0000 From: zoe slattery User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@aries.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing Aries References: <4D39A5C7.1090508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 21/01/2011 15:30, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > On 21 January 2011 15:27, zoe slattery wrote: >> Hi - I'm having an interesting time with this. I have done all the work on >> the branch to tidy it up but, to my surprise, when I ran the 'mvn >> release:perform' step intending to release parent (which has to be released >> before the others) it initiates the production and deployment of a full >> snapshot - of the whole project. >> >> This took 105 minutes and failed. It looks from the maven docs as though I >> should possibly have deployed a snapshot before starting the release > I'm sure I didn't have to do this for 0.1. And even if it's necessary > it should only be necessary for the 'parent' module. OK - got it - wrong SCM entries in the parent pom :-/ >> process. Does anyone know if this is a mandatory step? I'll clean up the >> failure ready to start again. >> >> Zoe >>