Mailing-List: contact aries-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of zoe.slattery@googlemail.com
 designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=hAjIbmPLfGkTClxDaCSYLMZVUYu5MIHImu8AJT3NB/RAZ9GQoVPYoNCZ/oIovam5sU
         bjLLXujlNcLqw3pUQEQuL9almj5qXFKH+hIU+uHMsmH21DrGnMReKS8FGLcLh2Rbt1cY
         YBC9dWdCYs7o1cthRS8q6o4/eRveTT+QS+E8Y=
Message-ID: <4B616C67.7020301@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:52:23 +0000
From: zoe slattery <zoe.slattery@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: aries-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Aries release
References: <adbf02b11001260934q2a868513sf073ed92811f831d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <A92ABBC2-2393-475E-943C-45A076A6B7EF@gmail.com>
 <a364c40b1001270241m3b3ca93s7f94b7c334bca3f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a364c40b1001270241m3b3ca93s7f94b7c334bca3f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Charles Moulliard wrote:
> I would like to suggest that the documentation of the web site is updated in
> pararrel of making a realese. A tutorial is available for Blueprint but few
> info or nothing concerning JNDI (publising and retrieving a OSGI service (or
> blueprint service), JPA, Transaction and Web (@Resource, packaging).
>   
Strongly agree. Specifically the blueprint  tutorial is out of date 
(ARIES-93), the blog sample needs documentation (ARIES-103).  I suggest 
we raise JIRAs  for missing/inadequate docs and gate a release on 
resolving them.

Zoe

> Kind Regards,
>
> Charles Moulliard
> Senior Enterprise Architect
> Apache Camel Committer
>
> *****************************
> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> Linkedlin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
>
> Apache Camel Group :
> http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2447439&trk=anet_ug_hm
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Valentin Mahrwald <
> vmahrwald@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> +1 for doing a release.
>>
>> As for the release version number, would this have any bearing on how we
>> version our package exports and bundles?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Valentin
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2010, at 17:34, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>>
>>  There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a
>>     
>>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should give
>>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the
>>> Incubator.
>>>
>>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the
>>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should
>>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that.
>>>
>>> What does everyone think?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>