aries-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alasdair Nottingham <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Aries release
Date Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:11:45 GMT
Good point. I think deprecating them and using a attribute on the
package export to indicate that it is likely to change would be a good


2010/1/26 David Jencks <>:
> I'd love to see a release of aries-blueprint in particular.  I wonder if it
> would be a good idea to mark "deprecated" some of the interfaces such as
> NamespaceHandler that aren't yet in a spec and might change but will be used
> by lots of people?  On the other hand geronimo-blueprint got released
> without such markings.
> thanks
> david jencks
> On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> There's been a lot of activity lately so I'd like to propose we do a
>> release so we can get some wider user feedback. I think we should give
>> it a version of 0.1 and stick to versions <1 while we're in the
>> Incubator.
>> Then there is the question of whether to independently version the
>> high level modules or keep them lock-step. For now I think we should
>> keep them lock-step until we feel a need to change that.
>> What does everyone think?
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremy

Alasdair Nottingham

View raw message