Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-aries-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68925 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 16:53:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 16:53:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 68205 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 16:53:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-aries-commits-archive@aries.apache.org Received: (qmail 68133 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 16:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@aries.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@aries.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list commits@aries.apache.org Received: (qmail 68112 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 16:53:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:53:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO eris.apache.org) (140.211.11.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:53:33 +0000 Received: by eris.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id C1D9823889EB; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: svn commit: r785095 - /websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:53:13 -0000 To: commits@aries.apache.org From: buildbot@apache.org X-Mailer: svnmailer-1.0.8 Message-Id: <20110209165313.C1D9823889EB@eris.apache.org> Author: buildbot Date: Wed Feb 9 16:53:13 2011 New Revision: 785095 Log: Staging update by buildbot Modified: websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html Modified: websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html ============================================================================== --- websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html (original) +++ websites/staging/aries/trunk/content/development/ReleaseProcessRequirements.html Wed Feb 9 16:53:13 2011 @@ -258,17 +258,20 @@ current process did not use semantic ver
  1. Conceptually very simple of consumers. For example, if as a consumer I pick up something called Blueprint version 0.4 I know that I will need to get Util version 0.4 to go with it.
  2. -
  3. A relatively simple release process, one JIRA component, one set of release notes.i
  4. +
  5. A relatively simple release process, one JIRA component, one set of release notes.
  6. We can release a set of samples at the same version with some guarentee that the samples all work with the release.

Disadvantages of releasing everything at once

    -
  1. Not using of OSGi semantic versioning of bundles.i After every we release we bump the major versions of all bundles in trunk.
  2. +
  3. Not using of OSGi semantic versioning of bundles. After every we release we bump the major versions of all bundles in trunk.
-

Package versions are managed separately and the Maven bundle plugin will ensure packges are imported in the correct range based of - the projects dependencies. Implementors need to use "provide:=true" to get the correct range. Package export version should be maintained either using package.info or in the pom.

+

Package versions are managed separately (correctly) and the Maven bundle plugin will ensure packges are imported in the correct range based of + the projects dependencies. Implementers need to use "provide:=true" to get the correct range. Package export version should be maintained +either using package.info or in the pom.xml.

Releasing by module

-

Our ideal for a release process would involve to release by module, one might visualise the process like this:

+

Our ideal for a release process would involve to release by module, this is +really just an evolution of the process that we already use but it would involve +using semantic versioning of bundles. One might visualise the process like this:

rel

In this case, we have a module version (independent of the version of its sub-modules) and a set of sub-modules which may each be indepndently versioned.