ariatosca-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (ARIA-134) Service.workflows field is not populated
Date Sun, 02 Apr 2017 08:46:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15952595#comment-15952595
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ARIA-134:
-------------------------------------

Github user ran-z commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-ariatosca/pull/91#discussion_r109303723
  
    --- Diff: extensions/aria_extension_tosca/simple_v1_0/modeling/__init__.py ---
    @@ -446,6 +451,29 @@ def get(name):
         return model
     
     
    +def create_workflow_operation_template_model(context, service_template, policy):
    +    model = OperationTemplate(name=policy._name,
    --- End diff --
    
    Do we want workflows to be modeled as OperationTemplates?
    There are indeed many similarities though some fields don't really apply, e.g. `retry_interval`;
What do you think?


> Service.workflows field is not populated
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIA-134
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIA-134
>             Project: AriaTosca
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ran Ziv
>            Assignee: Tal Liron
>
> Service.workflows field is not populated
> It should be populated with policies whose role is set to Workflow



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message