Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-archiva-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82074 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2010 11:45:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Jun 2010 11:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 72636 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 11:45:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-archiva-users-archive@archiva.apache.org Received: (qmail 72372 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 11:45:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@archiva.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@archiva.apache.org Received: (qmail 72353 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2010 11:45:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:45:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:45:11 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ORkrT-0003WG-4z for users@archiva.apache.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:44:51 -0700 Message-ID: <28981594.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:44:51 -0700 (PDT) From: leahpar To: users@archiva.apache.org Subject: Re: Archiva CPU Usage In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: raphael.petit@free.fr References: Bonjour, I've been face with this issue in the past. This following explanation may be wrong but in my case it seems that In production Archiva runs on a window OS that host also a virus scanner with very strict rules : it scans jar because they are recognized as zip file. Each time the nexus indexer create a temporary file the scanner 'takes' it and sometimes the indexer fail This leads to 1- the device cpu is quite high during indexing (it can go up to 100%) 2- the indexer fails so artifacts disappear and reappear later in the browse/search In test environment (win or linux) without all the 'enterprise security tools' this does not occured. Cordialement Chris LeCompte wrote: > > Has anyone else seen Archiva peg the CPU at 100% while indexing? It > looks like it's continually updating the nexus index files even when > there are no new artifacts to index. Is this normal? Any ideas? How > can I view what tasks are currently scheduled, other than attaching a > debugger? Thanks. > > Chris > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Archiva-CPU-Usage-tp28965855p28981594.html Sent from the archiva-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.