Mailing-List: contact users-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@archiva.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <24640851.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sergey Nikitin <nikitin.k172@gmail.com>
To: users@archiva.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re : Archiva performance question
In-Reply-To: <654826.17426.qm@web28506.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <24590470.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <654826.17426.qm@web28506.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>


Hello,

Yesterday i've tried Archiva with Oracle and Hsqldb as artefacts database.

Oracle was not working for me due to problems with varchar2 size (Archiva
tries to make a column with varchar2(4000+), which is not possible). Few
workarounds haven't worked, so i just left it without digging deep.

Hsqldb is ok, but performance win was about 5%.

Im still looking forward to any information concerning my initial question

Sergey


Julien HENRY wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> In my company some users are reporting the same issue: they prefer to use
> direct repository access instead of our internal Archiva because of
> performance drop.
> 
> I plan to use an external DB instead of embedded Derby to see if it
> improves performances, but I'm very interested to know if there is
> something else I can do.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Julien
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Archiva-performance-question-tp24590470p24640851.html
Sent from the archiva-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.