Mailing-List: contact dev-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@archiva.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4106528.tJOsnXxL9m@golgafrichnam>
References: <4106528.tJOsnXxL9m@golgafrichnam>
From: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:06:54 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPoyBqTKUnYJ1XjgOYjSwOtDocZ03OywBSp8FgEgMJgyrKQXXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: maven-indexer / Lucene
To: dev@archiva.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114e2248dcd24b0551d21521"
archived-at: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:07:20 -0000

--001a114e2248dcd24b0551d21521
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,
Remember jackrabbit depends on Lucene as well so upgrading Lucene can be a
problem here.
Regarding maven-indexer yes we can depend on a snapshot until the release.
I can release it ;-)


On 13 June 2017 at 06:06, Martin <martin_s@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the lucene version depends on the maven indexer. But I'm not sure about the
> current state of maven-indexer. The version has not changed since some
> 2013.
>
> There are commits on the master branch since then, and the lucene version
> has
> been changed too, but no releases were tagged.
> Does it make sense to switch to the maven-indexer 6.0-SNAPSHOT?
>
> As I know there are new compact index formats with new lucene versions but
> I'm
> not sure if this is relevant for the maven indexes.
>
> Cheers
>
> Martin
>


-- 
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

--001a114e2248dcd24b0551d21521--