Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-archiva-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-archiva-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D53DF11EB4 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27657 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2014 09:15:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-archiva-dev-archive@archiva.apache.org Received: (qmail 27526 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2014 09:15:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@archiva.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@archiva.apache.org Received: (qmail 27510 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2014 09:15:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:15:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sascha.vogt@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.170] (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:15:38 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so906308wib.1 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:15:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xmkc7XQZDZBHA7NK2oHsblP0BSe1E2VFbrwWb26daYU=; b=r13Tdlc64I7GVjfKAyxshhOzvtKfNz91XZBsgLqJu9O14Z7ODNNm76GGZDEg+oTktn KqoeLoBMXOKRbdWYjWdD2BGKGh1DPSClwCKcqLPx59/tlalO8AKIldFNtBknDoySvAQg BrJQqylEVYrkFITd4GgdPyBZjVvpYW3pXdfH3bn0qik+MNC5AtHym19AWl4Gnkmzrx/m h+xMnssNlbDCml1KKVLRTSBhr2wTM+b5Db4apPAIGLEpF2zSHR3au0uVsT9FGxHKh/y1 muV8fOkbHrVQHessJf9zd6PzZRKvXQv+mmdof0QSH54aCHOCvis2VL0Tr+X4diqqndtj ZDzw== X-Received: by 10.180.94.8 with SMTP id cy8mr5424115wib.29.1398330915701; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (static.81.32.76.144.clients.your-server.de. [144.76.32.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fi2sm34180272wic.15.2014.04.24.02.15.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:15:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: Sascha Vogt Message-ID: <5358D621.7090706@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:15:13 +0200 From: Sascha Vogt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@archiva.apache.org Subject: Re: Improvements to search [was: Performance issues after upgrading to 2.0.1] References: <534E6EA7.5060600@gmail.com> <534EAA7E.1050807@gmail.com> <534F9B7B.1070500@gmail.com> <5357BDBD.2060109@gmail.com> <5357C72F.1020702@gmail.com> <003701cf5f9b$99f05db0$cdd11910$@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <003701cf5f9b$99f05db0$cdd11910$@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, >> Am 23.04.2014 15:18, schrieb Sascha Vogt: >> Now in general a few things, which I think improve the situation: >> 1. The max count should be changeable (at least when using advanced >> parameters) >> 2. Don't duplicate the results for each version, instead do it like >> search.maven.org -> Display the latest version only and give a link to >> the artifact (which has all the versions listed) and telling only the >> number of other versions available >> >> How do others feel about those changes? If everyone can aggree on >> them, I'll open an issue and see, if I can work on it. I created https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1835 and https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRM-1836 I'm a bit tight on time, as I'm moving flats this weekend. As soon as I have set myself up there I'll try to address them. If you have any more suggestions or additions - just post them to the issues. By the way, if some of the more experienced devs find time, please go ahead ;) These issues are by no means "reserved" to me A few general dev questions: 1. would it be OK to change the .gitignore to also include the typical Eclipse project files (.project, .classpath and .settings/*) 2. What is the easiest for you to apply patches? Are these Github Pull-Requests OK? Or is there something else which is easier for you? 3. At least under Windows I have issues getting the tests to run, any tips? Will try on my Mac, if this should work better 4. What would you recommend as IDE? Does anybody of the core devs run Eclipse? Greetings -Sascha-