archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 2.0.0 Release time
Date Tue, 14 Jan 2014 07:04:31 GMT
Sorry, Olivier, is that "a delete the tag and respin" answer or not?

-Chris


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:

> On 14 January 2014 10:52, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 14 Jan 2014, at 9:34 am, Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 13 January 2014 12:02, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> Would it make sense to go through some RC cycles? We should plan some
> specific promotion of the 2.0.0 release once it is GA.
> >>
> >> I believe we already did 1.4-M1 to M4 (this sounds already RC for me
> :-) )
> >
> > I was thinking more like the typical Maven releases - in other words, if
> we put up 2.0.0 for vote and it fails, what happens next? Re-spin 2.0.0,
> move to 2.0.1, or do we start out with some 2.0.0-RCx releases until it's
> good? Or do we do more snapshot testing until we already have a passable
> number of +1's and then just vote on 2.0.0 then?
> >
> RCx some good for a major release. I can start working with a RC branch.
>
> But I'd like we use the Tomcat model (move from 2.0.0 to 2.0.1 etc..
> and keep the tag in svn) but for IMHO make more sense to have 2.0.0
> first before a 2.0.1 :-)
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Definitely like to see releases moving forward. I know I've been slack
> on testing recently... unfortunately this week is particularly bad as I'm
> fully booked up already :)
> >>
> >> Releasing will be more than a week. So no worries you will have time to
> test :P
> >
> > Thanks :)
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter   @brettporter
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message