archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eric Barboni" <Eric.Barb...@irit.fr>
Subject RE: Future plans for archiva ?
Date Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:37:26 GMT
Yep, label are nice but not trivial to triage backlog issues (for newcommer
:p)

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] De la part de Brett Porter
Envoyé : mardi 25 septembre 2012 00:45
À : dev@archiva.apache.org
Objet : Re: Future plans for archiva ?

Now that JIRA has labels, these are probably the best way to flag such
things - that way they can span a number of releases but you can keep track
of them all together.

On 25/09/2012, at 3:39 AM, Eric Barboni <Eric.Barboni@irit.fr> wrote:

> Maybe we can create some roadmap entry like it was done for ui-rewrite 
> just to maybe not bind to a numerical version.
> 
> Was thinking on one for (repository API stuff + runtime plugin) .
> Another one for grouping thinks on auth (because of potential rewrite).
> 
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Brett Porter [mailto:brett@porterclan.net] De la part de Brett 
> Porter Envoyé : lundi 24 septembre 2012 06:34 À : 
> dev@archiva.apache.org Objet : Re: Future plans for archiva ?
> 
> Sorry for the delayed response, just picked up on this. Aside from the 
> roadmap-level things Olivier and JB mentioned, in JIRA I think we did 
> reasonably well of keeping things targeted to a good version. And 
> anything not in a version should be responded to and put into one if
appropriate.
> Triage is always a valuable thing to do...
> 
> On 03/09/2012, at 9:59 PM, Eric Barboni <Eric.Barboni@irit.fr> wrote:
> 
>> As I am quite new to Archiva and as there are a lots of opened issues 
>> in Jira, I have not a clear opinion of what should be done.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Seems that in a near future  1.4-M3 will be released for new UI rewrite.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It seems that there will be a plugin way of supporting different 
>> repository type (more or less new Repository API ) (sounds great)
>> 
>> AFAIK That the new big rewrite plan.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Why not:
>> 
>> doing also plugin mechanism for authentication provider (i.e. ldap) + 
>> configuration parameters in UI instead of in xml files ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Eric
>> 
>> PS: I keep playing with jdk 7 tests.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
> http://twitter.com/brettporter
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
http://twitter.com/brettporter







Mime
View raw message