Mailing-List: contact dev-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@archiva.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adrien.lecharpentier@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <FB1240E7-35B7-4303-94DA-4AEEB92CBB91@apache.org>
References: <20120705204359.194C02388A68@eris.apache.org>
	<7A38059C-5C20-48CB-8DB0-72749FEF0EC6@apache.org>
	<CAPoyBqT_bnL6JFwmqLhjTnCj=u7j5c=nXrd2h=EFjKbcqHsLWg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPoyBqTG4R1vTTendPO92FEcJigMEftzA75xt9BzAJyDAdcHYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<FB1240E7-35B7-4303-94DA-4AEEB92CBB91@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 11:33:41 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAKwJSvw-=7mzwJSbsgNUNabu6DbUappNW-oLbXpOCqmRWzJrmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1357890
From: Adrien Lecharpentier <adrien.lecharpentier@gmail.com>
To: dev@archiva.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517a756ab90ca04c425f573

--bcaec517a756ab90ca04c425f573
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

Ok, this is my mistake. I'm making the new patch with some tests fixe from
the original patch.

--
Adrien Lecharpentier


2012/7/6 Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>

>
> On 06/07/2012, at 7:15 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > I understand the company copyright issue.
> > But if I read that http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0#apply
> > There is a Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> > ??
>
> That describes how another projects using the Apache License should apply
> the headers. For code contributed to the ASF, this is the policy:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>
> In particular:
> --
> If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it,
> the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either:
>         =E2=80=A2 remove such notices, or
>         =E2=80=A2 move them to the NOTICE file associated with each appli=
cable
> project release, or
>         =E2=80=A2 provide written permission for the ASF to make such rem=
oval or
> relocation of the notices.
> --
>
> Having permission to remove the header below avoids us having to maintain
> the duplicate.
>
> - Brett
>
>
> >
> > 2012/7/6 Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>:
> >> Ouch yes sorry I didn't check that !!
> >> My bad.
> >> I will.
> >>
> >> 2012/7/6 Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>> On 06/07/2012, at 6:43 AM, olamy@apache.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * Copyright 2012 Zenika
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
> >>>> + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
> >>>> + * You may obtain a copy of the License at
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
> >>>> + *
> >>>> + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
> software
> >>>> + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS=
,
> >>>> + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or
> implied.
> >>>> + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions
> and
> >>>> + * limitations under the License.
> >>>> + */
> >>>
> >>> Can we request the submitter replace these license headers?
> >>>
> >>> - Brett
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--bcaec517a756ab90ca04c425f573--