Mailing-List: contact dev-help@archiva.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@archiva.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dantran@gmail.com designates
 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=rk+cNlVBsMW9CyY9KcpAwM70IF9BM7ROPRMer9SsZBxiKRQuxZinrTg1oOoxVqA13c
         aQokY0PzCUfd15J3mwpoJgjqB6PMmD6ZzaYj7CZZFfQx24X84TkiH8olxy4qVqrlRHg4
         6rnfHiRHPA6+66WVAOKDaoB2lGnXyG4jXMkBM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <28122612.post@talk.nabble.com>
References: <EB8759D2-21BD-4446-A78B-5C04068063AF@apache.org>
	 <A1F0CF37-E3C7-4C43-9212-D4E446F1662D@apache.org>
	 <8667b1bd1003222331r6ec07e2ah10909b5d287ceda8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8667b1bd1003231650g50a648d6kf0d173ebb5982882@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8667b1bd1003270800t4383af1ckf8170cf99fadd343@mail.gmail.com>
	 <28122612.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:04:14 -0700
Message-ID: <y2wc38ad92d1004021504g4eb37714x4991951be5f0d2b9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GSoC projects?
From: Dan Tran <dantran@gmail.com>
To: dev@archiva.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

question, is it ethical for us to look at a commercial project like
Nexus staging and try to imitate its feature?

-Dan

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:15 PM, eshan sudharaka <esudharaka@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>
> i went through the Nexus tutorial and finally came up with the following
> approach.This is very high level and i need help from u guys to fill the
> missing part.
>
> * Assign a Temporory reposotory for a group.(eg : com.MyTempRep.example)
>
> * Only they are allowed to publish artifacts and the tempo rory repo is o=
nly
> open to them untill deploye the all artifacts to =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0be tested.(not visible to
> the common repo with have tesed modules)
>
> * =C2=A0once the temporory reposotory is closed it should me prevented fr=
om the
> developers being updating and it should be opened to QA people to
> testing(Same temporory repo will be used.only acces grants should be chag=
ed
> and assing the acces for the QA =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 group)
>
> * once testing is done > if it success then merge the temp repo to the
> common repo(where the tested modules are located)
>
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0> if it fails then manually removed from the repo.
>
> I dont understand how the audit log is linking with this project idea.cou=
ld
> u please explain it?
> and also are we need to wary about the changes that are done in the
> artifacts in temporary repo (by developers).I mean whether we should prov=
ide
> a facility like svn diff ?
>
> eshan sudharaka
> thank you
>
>
>
>
> Deng Ching-2 wrote:
>>
>> I already filed the project ideas we've discussed in the ASF JIRA:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dtrue&&=
query=3DArchiva+&summary=3Dtrue&description=3Dtrue&pid=3D12311010&status=3D=
1&customfield_12310260=3Dgsoc
>>
>> -Deng
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Deng Ching <oching@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I got a reply from the student who contacted me about GSoC and he said
>>> he's
>>> still interested :) His name is Eshan Sudharaka btw.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Deng
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Deng Ching <oching@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Heh I think we hit send at the same time. I sent an email already to
>>>> dev@community.apache.org for a request for the Archiva project to be
>>>> added to the ASF Jira so we could file issues for the GSoC :) No reply
>>>> from
>>>> them yet though.
>>>>
>>>> -Deng
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote=
:
>>>>
>>>>> I moved this over to the wiki and will mail it to
>>>>> dev@community.apache.org. I only added a few since we don't have that
>>>>> many mentors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any further ideas / volunteers?
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we should add some more detail to the staging / promotion one=
.
>>>>> Anyone have particular thoughts on it?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/03/2010, at 11:13 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Do we want to propose any projects for Google Summer of Code for
>>>>> Archiva?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > These are the sorts of ones I can think of:
>>>>> > - MRM-976 - introduce a better event API
>>>>> > - MRM-1209 - project tree view
>>>>> > - MRM-980 - merging repositories
>>>>> > - MRM-1021 - staging / promotion
>>>>> > - atomic deployment (as discussed by Marc on here recently)
>>>>> > - Propose your own / pick from from the backlog
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thoughts / volunteers / priorities?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Brett
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Brett Porter
>>>>> > brett@apache.org
>>>>> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Brett Porter
>>>>> brett@apache.org
>>>>> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GSoC-projects--tp2792=
6425p28122612.html
> Sent from the archiva-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>