archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arnaud HERITIER" <aherit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Archiva 1.1
Date Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:04:22 GMT
Thus, we unrelease the 1.1 in Jira, we move 1.1.1 in it and we relaunch the
1.1 release when we are ready ?

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:

> Hehe, I *thought* I was having deja vu... we did already agree to follow
> that style, not the httpd one. [1]
>
> Though that was also in the context of milestones, and in the end we ended
> up getting all the way to 1.1. Does anyone think we need to reconsider in
> light of that, and the issue with the release?
>
> I'm fine with either style. After due consideration, the only thing I'm not
> in favour of is releasing/announcing the binaries of the current 1.1 build
> since it would cause too much confusion.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/xijhr4tq5ktfu33z
>
>
> On 11/07/2008, at 6:24 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>
>  I'm also against the idea to have a 1.1.1 without 1.1. It was the coice we
>> made for the release process (eclipse like vs httpd like)
>> The only blocker thing I see with the actual 1.1 is the problem to merge
>> metadata.
>> I didn't check if it is fixed but if this was done I'm in favor to include
>> it in 1.1
>> If we don't know when we'll be able to fix it, we continue the release and
>> we document the issue.
>>
>> Arnaud
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Emmanuel Venisse <
>> emmanuel.venisse@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Will you rename 1.1.1 to 1.1?
>>> I don't like the idea to release a 1.1.1 without a 1.1 before.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Wendy Smoak <wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Based on all the discussion, my preference is to cancel the vote, not
>>>> publish 1.1, and just move on with 1.1.1 soon.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to announce it but then advise people to wait for 1.1.1.
>>>> And putting it in the repo/on the mirrors _without_ announcing it (as
>>>> suggested on irc this evening) doesn't make sense to me.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Maria Odea Ching <oching@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is a summary of what has been discussed and agreed upon in the
>>>>>
>>>> IRC
>>>
>>>> earlier today:
>>>>> 1. Still push 1.1 out and release 1.1.1 right after
>>>>> 2. Note the localhost issue in the 1.1 release notes so users are aware
>>>>>
>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> it
>>>>> 3. There are 3 new issues that will be included in 1.1.1, which are:
>>>>>  - [MRM-870] - addRepositoryToGroup.action => AbstractMethodError
on
>>>>> DeferredDocumentImpl.getXmlStandalone()
>>>>>  - [MRM-871] - jetty.host and jetty.port properties are set by
>>>>>
>>>> default
>>>
>>>> in
>>>>
>>>>> jetty.xml preventing user from using other hostname if user is not
>>>>>
>>>> aware
>>>
>>>> of
>>>>
>>>>> these properties
>>>>>  - [MRM-730] - Index/Search by class, method or package name
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message