archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <>
Subject Re: What do we need to establish?
Date Sat, 10 May 2008 20:19:19 GMT
On 09/05/2008, at 6:19 PM, Maria Odea Ching wrote:

> Maybe we could start with the release procedure?
> This is what we currently have:
> It's basically adopted from Maven's release procedure.
> Does anyone think the 72 hrs. voting time is not enough for testing  
> the
> release? Or there's something wrong with the ordering of the process  
> that we
> have now? Thoughts, anyone? :-)

I think this process will evolve, but I think it's fine. I would ask  
that only publicly announc-able, final, releases go to the mirrors and  
repo1, whatever the version scheme we use (we can use for the rest).

72 hours is a minimum as Wendy said - I'd leave it up to the person  
doing the release to extend that if they feel it's necessary due to  
the significance of changes.


Brett Porter

View raw message