Mailing-List: contact archiva-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <64D60579-31B6-48F0-8C3F-1E9A4D8BA35F@apache.org>
From: Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>
To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <2B2BF216-2590-4CCA-AAAF-9FA9D61E3FD8@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: proposed structural change to the source repo
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:19:25 +1100
References: <2B2BF216-2590-4CCA-AAAF-9FA9D61E3FD8@apache.org>

Ok, I've done this - will now work on cleaning up the reporting.

I also changed the group ID to org.apache.archiva. I have not done  
this on the branch for 1.0.x however.

- Brett

On 28/03/2008, at 7:36 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

> Since we're moving tomorrow anyway, I'd like to propose making the  
> following change subsequently:
>
> /archiva
> /archiva-docs
> /archiva-jetty
> /archiva-modules
>   .. current structure under here
>
> This means we can retain the one release, one build - but all the  
> Java code sites under -modules. This allows us to put all the Java  
> code reporting in there, and not pollute the -docs and the distro  
> with it.
>
> I think more changes can be made to the structure of -modules, but  
> that can be done at a later time.
>
> Any objections?
>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>

--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/