Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-maven-archiva-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 89027 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2008 03:20:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2008 03:20:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 32483 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2008 03:20:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-maven-archiva-dev-archive@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32441 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2008 03:20:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact archiva-dev-help@maven.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list archiva-dev@maven.apache.org Received: (qmail 32432 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2008 03:20:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:20:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.36.241.87] (HELO mail.sventech.com) (69.36.241.87) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 03:20:04 +0000 Received: from mail.sventech.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sventech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D7A48051 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.118] (ip70-162-156-160.ph.ph.cox.net [70.162.156.160]) by mail.sventech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D1348050 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47E71DF3.7070304@erdfelt.com> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:20:19 -0700 From: Joakim Erdfelt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8pre) Gecko/20071022 Thunderbird/2.0.0.6 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: archiva-dev@maven.apache.org Subject: Does modello still have a place? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've been wondering if we should reevaluate our decision to use modello, now that we've made a decision to use JDK 1.5 we've got Annotations, and we've also collectively agreed to use Spring, which has some integration points too. It seems that we can drop modello and just use static classes and Annotations to get the jdo mapping pieces and xml bindings for the database backup/restore functions too. wdyt? - Joakim