archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Arnaud HERITIER" <aherit...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MRM-462 progress
Date Tue, 21 Aug 2007 06:36:30 GMT
I know that you were joking. And it's not a problem actually. As you
said your branch have a short time to live and you did it because you
were not sure of the result (what is a good case to create a branch).
What I hope is that it will continue to be done in this state of mind.

cheers

arnaud

On 21/08/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> hehe - to be clear, I was kind of joking. My stuff is on a branch
> because I don't like local changes and because it isn't yet 100%
> working. I don't want to interfere with the release.
>
> It's existence will also help Joakim to review it and understand
> where there are potential conflicts, and minimise the damage. Right,
> Joakim? :)
>
> I don't intend to maintain it any longer than this week.
>
> On 21/08/2007, at 3:10 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
>
> > It's why I'm not in favor of the decision we made to use branches.
> > First times it could be a game. Following times it's quickly the war.
> > The one who want to be the first to back home (in a corporate env)
> > will commit its code with less checks and the last one will be
> > punished by having to merge others changes. In opensource we are less
> > in a hurry, thus I hope we'll not see the second case happen.
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > On 21/08/07, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >> I'm not merging until I'm done, and I'll give a heads up.
> >>
> >> But please, be nice... :)
> >>
> >> Actually, maybe we should race. Loser has to resolve the
> >> conflicts! :)
> >>
> >> - Brett
> >>
> >> On 21/08/2007, at 1:04 PM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a decent raft of new code coming in as part of MRM-463
> >>> (metadata stuff), can you hold off until that commit comes in?
> >>>
> >>> - Joakim
> >>>
> >>> Brett Porter wrote:
> >>>> I decided to use a branch for the configuration split since I
> >>>> thought it could be (at least partially) contentious, and is at
> >>>> least quite disruptive. I won't have a problem merging the lot
> >>>> down to trunk once completed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please review the changes if you are interested in it - I'm
> >>>> confident that the changes outside the webapp are solid since all
> >>>> the tests are passing again (I've added some coverage that was
> >>>> missing in archiva-configuration, the rest are much less
> >>>> consequential changes).
> >>>>
> >>>> The next step is to change the webapp, and I'l be adding tests
> >>>> there to ensure that the functionality is working. This could take
> >>>> a little longer.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm worried at how much the implementation details of the
> >>>> configuration have leaked out throughout the application -
> >>>> something to review later on.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Brett
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > ..........................................................
> > Arnaud HERITIER
> > ..........................................................
> > OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> > www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> > ..........................................................
> > ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> > www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> > ...........................................................
>


-- 
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................

Mime
View raw message