archiva-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: separation of get and webdav (was: What is Archiva.NEXT ?)
Date Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:55:21 GMT
What does everyone think about this?

On 04/07/2007, at 11:28 AM, Brett Porter wrote:

> So, last time this topic came up, there was disagreement on the / 
> get/ interface.
>
> Regarding using /get/ instead of just /repository/ URL as is, I  
> said (<C33E9648-0E38-4B2A-A9E7-88D71C8EFAA5@apache.org>)...
> "Ok, while I'd definitely prefer to make it work, if it can't then  
> I'd prefer we made the change in the other direction (the default  
> repository URL is get only, we have /repository-id/webdav/ as the  
> webdav exposure point)."
> to which Nicolas agreed.
>
> We then diverged into discussing auto-discovery of the getId from  
> the path which there were technical reasons to not do.
>
> However, I do not want all repositories to look like /archiva/ 
> repository/releases/get/maven2/. Yikes.
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> On 04/07/2007, at 12:32 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
>
>> Design.
>>
>> 1) Create DynamicGetServlet which parses ....
>>     /get/${getId}/${getResource}
>> 2) Create Maven1GetProvider which has an id "maven1", and serves  
>> artifacts / poms to it.
>> 3) Create Maven2GetProvider which has an id "maven2", and serves  
>> artifacts / poms / metadata to it.
>> 4) Test
>> 5) Done.
>>
>> - Joakim
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> Sounds good. With the M1 client support, can you post a small  
>>> design proposal first since last I remember we didn't reach  
>>> consensus on how it should be implemented?
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2007, at 8:15 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree.
>>>>
>>>> I view 1.0-beta-1 as feature complete.
>>>>
>>>> The current missing features ...
>>>> * Reporting (about 80% there right now, just some UI pieces left  
>>>> to hook up)
>>>> * Maven 1 Client Support (about 40% complete. need to hook up  
>>>> DynamicGetServlet)
>>>> * Live documentation. (present in archiva.war)
>>>>
>>>> - Joakim
>>>>
>>>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/07/2007, at 3:28 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Archiva 1.0-alpha-2 is out in the wild... what's next?  1.0- 
>>>>>> beta-1
>>>>>> seems reasonable, but /topic in #archiva says "coming soon, the
>>>>>> Archiva 1.0 (the "Ship It" release)".
>>>>>
>>>>> I was kidding (but that should be the focus from now on. Get it  
>>>>> done.) I agree 1.0-beta-1 is next - it should be feature complete.
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Brett
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> - Joakim Erdfelt
>>>>  joakim@erdfelt.com
>>>>  Open Source Software (OSS) Developer
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> - Joakim Erdfelt
>>  joakim@erdfelt.com
>>  Open Source Software (OSS) Developer

Mime
View raw message