apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1790105 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x: locks/unix/misc.c locks/unix/proc_mutex.c locks/unix/thread_mutex.c test/testlock.c
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:40:00 GMT
apr-trunk (r1790379):
  % ./testall -v testprocmutex
  testprocmutex       : -Line 189: Locks don't appear to work with timedlock
  -flock_timedlock() not implemented,/Line 189: Locks don't appear to work with timedlock
  -Line 189: Locks don't appear to work with timedlock
  -fcntl_timedlock() not implemented,-Line 133: create the mutex
  /default_timed_timedlock() not implemented,-Line 172: Default timed timedlock not implemented
  FAILED 4 of 6
  Failed Tests   		Total	Fail	Failed %
  ===================================================
  testprocmutex  		    6	   4	 66.67%

apr-1.6 (r1790305):
  % ./testall -v testprocmutex
  testprocmutex       : -flock_timedlock() not implemented,-Line 194: Locks don't appear to
work with timedlock
  -fcntl_timedlock() not implemented,FAILED 1 of 6
  Failed Tests   		Total	Fail	Failed %
  ===================================================
  testprocmutex  		    6	   1	 16.67%

we seem to be going backwards (apr-trunk includes the fallback)
since now we lost default_timed_timedlock()
Mime
View raw message