apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Kew <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1790105 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.6.x: locks/unix/misc.c locks/unix/proc_mutex.c locks/unix/thread_mutex.c test/testlock.c
Date Wed, 05 Apr 2017 17:28:47 GMT
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:53:30 -0500
William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

> >> Howbout a --with-experimental-timedlocks config option ?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > although anyone toggling an -experimental flag is expected
> > to understand their resulting apr breaks binary compatibility.
> 
> Or... do we stub them in all as APR_ENOTIMPL if the experimental
> flag is not given?

Sounds like a plan.

Keep API/ABI compatible either way, get the new code some exposure,
but only among users who ticked the disclaimer!

-- 
Nick Kew

Mime
View raw message