Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A049200C37 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:44:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 888A8160B7D; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D43AD160B6D for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 29263 invoked by uid 500); 19 Mar 2017 18:44:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 29253 invoked by uid 99); 19 Mar 2017 18:44:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 94FD3C213B for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.001 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RDNS_NONE=3] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a-wllnVGgNEq for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0B9E95F341 for ; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cpfoA-0000Y7-SE for dev@apr.apache.org; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:44:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@apr.apache.org From: Jan Ehrhardt Subject: Re: 1.6 release timetable Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:44:01 +0100 Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <20170317233134.6de622c2@bifrost.webthing.com> <1489823857.3937.353.camel@mimir.webthing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 archived-at: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 18:44:30 -0000 Nick Kew in gmane.comp.apache.apr.devel (Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:57:37 +0000): >On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 08:28 +0100, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: > >> Will this 1.6 release contain support of OpenSSL 1.1.x or is that part >> of a future release? > >Good question. I see no bugzilla entry for it. A quick search >on this list reveals just two messages, dated 29/3/16. >Are you asking whether the changes Rainer refers to in >http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201603.mbox/%3C56FA52EC.8050301%40kippdata.de%3E >are in it? If so, your own feedback to Rainer's "does it >work for you?" question would be great? The 2 Windows related files in apr/apr-util/crypto still use the pre-1.1 OpenSSL lib files, libeay32.lib and ssleay32.lib: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr-util/branches/1.6.x/crypto/apr_crypto_openssl.dsp?view=markup#l121 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr-util/branches/1.6.x/crypto/apr_crypto_openssl.mak?view=markup#l108 So, the answer to the question "does it work for you?" seems to be No. -- Jan