Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FAE200BFB for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:26:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E8A1B160B4E; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B0C6160B3B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:26:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 39318 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2017 21:26:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 39308 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2017 21:26:18 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D2F75180B1E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dDRz-VhF_9Vh for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f174.google.com (mail-qt0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3FB5F5FAC3 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f174.google.com with SMTP id v23so695137qtb.0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:26:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Or8JWrfKI65m3NSRTb59rUxpDWfKVgQjuduEVutwenU=; b=cQc5qNQxLY2jQ1rMtrOKw6QdFn9kG9wTmShLiRanGRvItj/wKo6ZxCyszRRTCHIXVY w0Cn4vIGPhvO4/lj4OHhNsuE4SBjASDt878ohGdeZ5Cli5FbDGEUsWTlZWYA2w1Xju4d MogSC7Kyw5+maBT2wMFwaD7eQee92u/WRv1g2Y0uDld4EFUvTTdWXNTFxclLWg9Og/dF nXf8Vguvs2xAJGdbkH21mqNawBfVbNV3qadcs9BFjUA1tYlgP2Q4CjS64hpseSVPWTYb 7ALijP/Dfp+AH888ThXsNqD//jOsX0OejCfWBU9hlwRM2+VaiC8Y6SnwyG4JhPCnzZsU JAnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Or8JWrfKI65m3NSRTb59rUxpDWfKVgQjuduEVutwenU=; b=ewNtY/z22YN6hx/SXeNpEoHKTIYMPAHxN+lKRaRLPpBQt8JFpdBa3zSE0BTTUcPsp5 H+yMXmkYH8XbOWRczsaF5GSHc4MgmJxcW5pp4nISeNFSp6CQ3dX9VeS2XNqVAMQRLxPz rmFJsP/gBSZAqrrCHJ9whFudB6H9m5UWJt1/80WkdoCQv0QMRHVU29jb+lizI0vwNGOG 0XlRZt4T2xbwQAqsuMGRPCHpnffT0daysmE9HaBRnwdbtYyiCGM4tJTSQDjdHiWboQyd GEucMeZiRjmcEejv6BD5JHBnpk+V8J3ZTL0ZQGFi9Z9EEAUoA5a8BDJuamRSS5q34t7j 1MNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKm4B8i8wTmtn0OzEAqLZJloC3cwf9ic7BV3fFU3wMIQYxAvuwaOrr01uChvuYcUhsJ2wApOiTuX3i5mw== X-Received: by 10.200.55.178 with SMTP id d47mr10555705qtc.60.1484169967909; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:26:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.177.66 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:26:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <88266bdb-ff23-f9f4-fd3e-e4750c64fe08@kippdata.de> <22F9DA06-06D8-4E40-BF9C-0FEB33906440@jaguNET.com> From: Yann Ylavic Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:26:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: testpoll To: APR Developer List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 21:26:25 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:05 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>> It looks like it is taking time for the message to >>>> arrive and that is what is causing the APR_EINTR. After >>>> all, it is behaving exacting like a wait for no data. >>>> The apr_sleep() "ensures" time. >>> >>> But isn't -1 'infinite' wait, by definition? >> >> I think Jim's patch is about the message sent not reaching the read >> size of the socket before poll() is call, hence the wakeup applies. > > Sorry, if your parser failed, s/size/side/ and s/call/called/ ;) For test fairness (i.e. when both data and wakeup are available, data win), I think the sleep should come after the wakeup, otherwise the test might pass because the wakeup is not there yet (though less likely to happen with pipe than with a socket).