apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: apr_redis
Date Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:45:13 GMT
On 02 Nov 2016, at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

> OK, so my plan is to start pulling the relevant bits out of Credis for
> use in apr_redis. I was thinking initially about maybe just using the
> library, but for parity w/ apr_memcache, that doesn't make sense.
> 
> Here's the rub: I'd prefer not having to do both the 1.6 and 2.0
> "ports" at the same time; instead I'd like to implement 1st in 1.6
> and then, once it gets the green light front-port it to 2.0. The
> issue, of course, is that 1.6 still has apr and apr-util.
> 
> Any concerns about this approach? Or would people prefer it be
> added 1st to 2.0/trunk and then folded into 1.6...

I’m imagining that it’s easier to work with apr-util v1.6 + httpd than apr v2.0 + httpd?
If so it makes sense. Can’t release v1.6.x until it’s also in v2.0 though, but that shouldn’t
be too much of a problem.

Regards,
Graham
—


Mime
View raw message