apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)
Date Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:57:08 GMT
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
wrote:

> This is as far as I got on my last iteration, electing what appear
> to be 'normal string' handling functions that are part of svn.
>
> Based on apr's short-name preference, I had yet to redecorate
> these functions as apr_cstr_* functions, but that I will get to
> tomorrow.  If you see something that doesn't fall into the normal
> string / general purpose criteria, feel free to holler before the first
> commit...
>

This is what is going in shortly... we don't have an svn_boolean_t
so those become int's, while svn_error_t * becomes an apr_status_t.

I'll proceed to commit this full set for scrutiny before digging through
for the various overlapping functions within apr and even across httpd.

Mime
View raw message