apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: apr_token_* conclusions (was: Better casecmpstr[n]?)
Date Thu, 21 Jan 2016 23:07:40 GMT
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
wrote:

>
> Based on apr's short-name preference, I had yet to redecorate
> these functions as apr_cstr_* functions, but that I will get to
> tomorrow.  If you see something that doesn't fall into the normal
> string / general purpose criteria, feel free to holler before the first
> commit...
>

And yes, I know it doesn't conform yet to our doxygen, one of the
reasons it was delayed until I could finish cleaning that up.  The
entire exercise is an svn cp of the sources from subversion so that
we preserve revision history into another home within apr.

Mime
View raw message