Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F00F9182B2 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17750 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2015 19:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 17649 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2015 19:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 17640 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2015 19:15:54 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:15:54 +0000 Received: from zulu.23.e-reka.si (89-233-126-4.dynamic.t-2.net [89.233.126.4]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 08BA81A0015 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: apr_token_* conclusions References: <9F4E6A21-9544-4F43-834A-F8DCF20693C9@jaguNET.com> <34DA4EC2-039B-40D5-B176-6E0F8517DC5E@jaguNET.com> <56562DAF.2080702@wanadoo.fr> <00ce01d127ce$121901b0$364b0510$@qqmail.nl> <56573B78.6090504@apache.org> <5657B696.2050603@apache.org> <87167909-25AA-4668-A9A7-4B44CA5AD524@jaguNET.com> To: dev@apr.apache.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=c4=8cibej?= Organization: The Apache Software Foundation Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Message-ID: <5658ABE7.5030408@apache.org> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 20:15:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87167909-25AA-4668-A9A7-4B44CA5AD524@jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 27.11.2015 15:59, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> On Nov 26, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >> In any case — I don't think anyone over at dev@s.a.o would object to APR >> including those functions. We actually have a number of other, heh, >> improvements on APR that we could "donate"; we just never really got >> around to producing the necessary patches. > Yeah, svn is in the same situation as httpd. There are > some functions would "ideally" would exist in APR, > but APR doesn't move "fast enough" to allow that to > happen, so both projects start collecting APR-like > kruft after awhile... > > It certainly would be nice if there was someway to address > that... Uh, what I wrote is in no way intended to be a criticism of APR. Maybe if people who think APR isn't moving fast enough spent their time writing code here instead of writing mails about it, this "problem" would just vanish. At least, that's my understanding of how open source is supposed to work -- right, Jim? ;) -- Brane