apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: apr_token_* conclusions
Date Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:59:41 GMT

> On Nov 26, 2015, at 8:49 PM, Branko Čibej <brane@apache.org> wrote:
> In any case — I don't think anyone over at dev@s.a.o would object to APR
> including those functions. We actually have a number of other, heh,
> improvements on APR that we could "donate"; we just never really got
> around to producing the necessary patches.

Yeah, svn is in the same situation as httpd. There are
some functions would "ideally" would exist in APR,
but APR doesn't move "fast enough" to allow that to
happen, so both projects start collecting APR-like
kruft after awhile...

It certainly would be nice if there was someway to address
View raw message