Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F95C182F3 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70750 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2015 12:02:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70663 invoked by uid 500); 28 Aug 2015 12:02:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70652 invoked by uid 99); 28 Aug 2015 12:02:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 796EBEF1CB for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.653 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.653 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apUPk8f8bms0 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net [69.252.207.40]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 38E582645F for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.115]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id AC2c1r0022VvR6D01C2i1X; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:42 +0000 Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.114]) by resomta-ch2-19v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id AC2h1r0062U0RYt01C2hxt; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:02:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: Time for APR 2.0? From: Jim Jagielski In-Reply-To: <2942161017041a218cb9e1beb5a882ba@ausics.net> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 08:02:41 -0400 Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <760AC0AB-6A93-427D-8AB0-C7B555115B8E@jaguNET.com> References: <55DE941F.20904@apache.org> <55DE94FE.1030909@apache.org> <55DECE11.8030800@gknw.net> <2942161017041a218cb9e1beb5a882ba@ausics.net> To: Noel Butler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1440763362; bh=sj28qSh9jKKJf+mvJ1/frrraY7hIkX3mZOhoLdCRvqA=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=WiaKYD+XsHaSTQt25QiR7A6axLSpZhyj/8XU/YF8ID1F4MaGFwFwwZh8vtSEK+g/z sbNje2MT3zL8XA8YihOjJFnA5QNuQIbXNDbXN7n0ibea4U13SufqkRyOyc7QqZ0hQy J0Yp93wOAiKzcJ8ctV28a3/jFjBfu7YxGiQL31w9UqUKmaBmgBigrC4Mr3fMN3AWO9 Q8SglfRdxJ0mjcuCMWx6K0V4/3+KqTPO4gxeFcKnuMhS8towgSfIbvRAMm7ieA2Lxm tsppU7QJatFVajPkQk7K8JvaV1rXxiiRoBWftV+5u32fO6v8HELzKMtY00hoOYycPE hJH3Mp77tWr7g== > On Aug 27, 2015, at 7:53 PM, Noel Butler = wrote: >=20 > =20 >> That's why I want us to extend cmake to do the unix build as well. >>=20 >> =20 >> =20 > The biggest bitch I here from *nix/bsd system admins everywhere is = cmake, the largest bitch is people know how to use --with-foo --with-bar = now after decades, THEY, the people you expect to use your software, = have to learn it no longer works that way, I know of multinationals = change software because of cmake, I've seen a well known large = international issue a policy that they will remain on old unsupported = versions of mysql because they moved to cmake. >=20 > autoconf et al, might be ol school, but every man, woman, and dog = knows and understands it, and its more than time proven, I've heard that = cmake is an in thing for windows stuff (I dont use any windaz anywhere = in our ops), but have you seen the stats on windows servers V *nix/bsd = lately, cmake may or may not be nicer for devs, but devs rarely manage = any large number of servers outside of their own build vm numbers, so = I'd think twice before changing unless you keep ol school as well. >=20 > I for one, consider it a PITA as well, thats my opinion anyway. Mine as well..., fwiw.=