apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Time for APR 1.5.2 ?
Date Fri, 13 Mar 2015 13:05:45 GMT
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Subj sez it all.
> Yeah.  I'll go through patch submissions and other new complaints in the
> next couple of days before getting started.  Others could/should do the
> same.
My list of things that could/should be done before rolling is too long :(
 Perhaps others can take a look?  Note that my short summaries may be

* New-ish bugs
** Triage them, resulting in a commit or feedback
** Useful buildconf patch? not analyzed:
** HP-UX issue needs analysis/feedback:
** Needs feedback on apr_proc_detach() behavior:
** Needs feedback on cross-compile issues:
** Autotools usage: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866
** Tricky Unix/Mac build issue:
** Mac gcc: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483
** Windows native code: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57295
** Check for backportable:
** MinGW build: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56342
** Windows native code: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56945
* Mailing list
** List any patches posted to the mailing list
** XXX list here
** Triage them, resulting in a commit or discussion or "open a bug"
* Review 1.5.x HEAD for
** undesirable changes
** changes without testcases, where it is practical and/or important to
have a testcase
* Jeff-specific: Build with latest cmake; also, see if any hints from
recent users@httpd need to go into README.cmake

It isn't necessary to go through everything just to have a release, but
we've ignored a fair amount of bugs and it would be good to try to catch up
now in case some fixes can be delivered now.

Born in Roswell... married an alien...

View raw message