On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Branko Čibej <email@example.com> wrote:
On 21.01.2014 02:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 21.01.2014 01:55, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> I've added a test case to testdir.c to exercise this code in parallel.
> r1559873, original patch (with slightly tweaked comments) and test case.Also r1559878 (1.5.x) and r1559879 (1.4.x).
> Bert, can you please double-check that this works on Windows?
I see intermittent failures testing the 1.5.x branch on Linux (4 cores, 8 threads) after picking up your new testcase. The two variations seen the most are
testdir : |Line 84: expected <0>, but saw <2>
testdir : \Line 87: expected <0>, but saw <2>
I've also seen a single failure at line 85 as well as this one that needs to be recovered from manually:testdir : -Line 199: expected <0>, but saw <39> (39 is "Directory not empty")
Current state as of the unrecoverable failure:$ find data/prll/data/prll/data/prll/11data/prll/11/12data/prll/11/12/13data/prll/11/12/13/14data/prll/11/12/13/14/15datadata/prll/11/12/13/14/15data/prlldata/prll/11/12/13/14/15data/prll/11data/prll/11/12/13/14/15data/prll/11/12
I didn't see a failure on Windows (2 virtualized processors).
Also, can you add a CHANGES entry in the 1.4.x and 1.5.x branches?