apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Branko ─îibej <br...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ftok (Was: Re: svn commit: r1561150 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c)
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:51:48 GMT
On 25.01.2014 00:41, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Of course, one could also say that anyone who uses internal
> APR implementation knowledge is doing something wrong...
>
> And they would have a point.
>
> But it still begs the question what to do w/ slotmem
> which must set shmem permissions. I would guess what
> we should really do is provide apr_shmem_perms(). We
> could then have httpd 2.4 require APR 1.5.1 or later
> and let those who choose to use ftok know the risks.

It would be APR 1.6, according to our API compat rules.

-- Brane


Mime
View raw message