apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: Race condition in APR_DECLARE_LATE_DLL_FUNC() implementation
Date Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:05:06 GMT
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:01:05 +0100
"Bert Huijben" <bert@qqmail.nl> wrote:

> I think the dll load function should be converted to a more stable
> pattern, that properly handles multiple threads. And perhaps we
> should just assume a few more NT functions to be alsways there
> instead of loading them dynamically.

This is possible with the 'mandatory' call to apr_init, but I think the
existing pattern should persist for those who don't like to call the
initialization logic.

Several of these must die with the deprecation of Win2k/XP, but several
others must be added or persist due to Win 8.1/8.0/7.0 discrepancies.

Mime
View raw message