I'm just curious why people never saw this on trunk...
That code path is almost exactly a year old. No one has
hit this in 12 months??
On Nov 23, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Rainer Jung <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung <email@example.com
>> <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
>> On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Anyone ever try OpenPA?
>>> It's under MIT, fwiw.
>> Haven't tried it but the README
>> indicates only platform support based on gcc plus Windows (but they say
>> they haven't set up a build system for it) plus Solaris (but that seems
>> to be Solaris 10+ only, at least my oldest Solaris 8 doesn't seem to
>> have the needed implementation).
>> By the way, Rainer, in your l*m*n test combinations, which compiler(s)
>> did you use on Solaris while confirming that 2.4.7 Event works at least
>> a little?
> I'm only building with gcc. On Solaris 8 with gcc 4.1.2, on Solaris 10
> the latest and greatest (4.8.2).
> Will post the full 2.4.7 results a bit later (only for the sake of
> completeness), but the builds are also broken for event on Linux 32 Bits
> even when using gcc:
> [Thu Nov 21 11:34:53.149765 2013] [mpm_event:crit] [pid 18492:tid
> 3080439472] AH02405: atomics not working as expected
> Sorry for not having checked progress during the tests, but the last
> combinations just finished right now.