apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Which of y'all are working on un-APR-izing gen_test_char, and how will the rest of us know if it is stalled and needs help?
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:22:25 GMT
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:27 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>wrote:

> On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 02:20:00 +0100
> Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > On 05.11.2013 22:51, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > > On 05 Nov 2013, at 11:04 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> TIA! (ping)
> > >>
> > >> If nobody in the gen_test_char-with-traditional-Windows-build
> > >> sub-thread knows what I'm talking about, please let me know.
> > >> Maybe I am confusedabout the planned work.
> > >
> > > (Am on holiday and travelling, so have limited time, but this was
> > > reasonably straightforward)
> > >
> > > This patch removes the APR specific stuff (and therefore the
> > > chicken-and-egg problem) and Works for Me(™) on MacOSX 10.8. Is
> > > this good enough to work on Windows and other platforms (Linux,
> > > etc)?
> > I would prefer to keep the unsigned char casts ...
>
> If the iterator is an unsigned int the promotion should be identical in
> behavior according to K&R v2, the oldest reference I can find.
>


Graham's patch is now in trunk and 1.5.x.  I guess that's what Gregg
tested.  It works for me on Linux and with the cmake-based build on Windows.

-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/

Mime
View raw message