Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release?
From: "Brian J. France" <brian@brianfrance.com>
In-Reply-To: <2969598C-8375-41F7-AAC0-6F0C1AF6E45A@jaguNET.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 07:50:59 -0400
Cc: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>, List List <dev@apr.apache.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C6A07B73-1909-483B-9E88-940F6DB94605@brianfrance.com>
References: <E6D9C514-F922-4951-BCE0-BB63BB2E0826@jaguNET.com>
 <CAKUrXK7FhuJuO2eDrAyfgLyuLorMcgap9hHR=6Ypd0HVYnLsVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <F3EB735A-2B29-4531-B646-85193C14507E@brianfrance.com>
 <2969598C-8375-41F7-AAC0-6F0C1AF6E45A@jaguNET.com>
To: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>


On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com> wrote:

>=20
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:35 AM, Brian J. France <brian@brianfrance.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> Subj sez it all.
>>>>=20
>>>> I've never been RM for APR but am willing to do this one...
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> I'm happy to take care of the RM work.
>>>=20
>>> Some things I'm interested in checking on for 1.5.x:
>>>=20
>>> * Compare 1.4.x<->1.5.x and see if anything was missed.  (I'm pretty =
sure
>>> that there are some .h fixes that skipped 1.5.x; dunno what else.)
>>> * Add the cmake support.  (I purposefully skipped the 1.5.x branch =
when
>>> there was constant activity.)
>>> * Put in a couple of fixes for Cygwin that somebody opened bugs for =
in the
>>> last week or so.
>>> * Test MinGW static and shared builds in conjunction with APR-util =
1.5.x.
>>> (Should be okay; some fixes for shared never hit the 1.4.x branch, =
so it
>>> would be good to ensure this is finally working.)
>>> * Check for anything whatsoever that could be merged from trunk and =
see
>>> what to do, as presumably there won't be another opportunity for a =
while.
>>>=20
>>> It would be good for T&R to be no sooner than next Monday.
>>>=20
>>> Any other thoughts on what to look at before T&R of the first 1.5.x =
release?
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Could we back port the file rotating stuff?
>>=20
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D905970
>>=20
>> I am about to import 1.4 into our builds at work and would jump =
straight to 1.5 if it had the rotation stuff (would remove our own =
rotation patches).
>>=20
>=20
> Certainly this needs Win32 patches, doesn't it?

Yes, it would.  I guess we never worked on that side of things.